Avocado Thrips Subproject 2: Agri-Mek and Success Evaluations and Phenology in the Field

Wee L. Yee, Phil A. Phillips, and Ben A. Faber
University of California Cooperative Extension, Ventura

Benefits to the Industry

The benefits of this research to the avocado industry are direct and are expected to be long lasting because it provides information that will help control avocado thrips, the most serious threat to avocado production in southern California in recent years and a pest that appears to be here permanently. In this project, we have determined the best spray volumes to apply by helicopter when using Veratran D (sabadilla) and Agri-Mek (abamectin) to control avocado thrips. This greatly benefits the industry because this will reduce costs to the grower; high spray volumes are more expensive to apply than low volumes, so applying the lowest volume that will result in effective control is the best option. We have also determined the efficacy of a new material registered for use on avocado. In March 2000, Success (spinosad) was fully registered for use against avocado thrips. However, this was made before any efficacy data with this material using helicopters were gathered. Because helicopter application is the major method of applying insecticides against avocado thrips in many areas of southern California, we carried out important trials to determine the material's efficacy compared with that of Agri-Mek. Results from this research will greatly benefit the industry by providing information on how the two insecticides may be used together in a control program. We have also determined the efficacy of Success when applied using a mist backpack sprayer, a piece of equipment that may prove valuable to growers who cannot use helicopters in their control efforts. Continued studies in 2000 to determine the relationships between thrips populations on leaves, fruit, leaf flush, and scarring of fruit and predators have added to knowledge gained in 1998 and 1999. This information will and has proven valuable in guiding the industry in the right direction in terms of its options in biological and cultural control practices.

Objectives

The objectives of field studies in Ventura County have been:

Determine the most efficacious spray volume to use when applying Veratran D and Agri-Mek by helicopter on small and large trees.
Determine efficacy of aerial applications using Success and Agri-Mek against avocado thrips, and to compare them with backpack applications of Success.
Determine population trends of avocado thrips on leaves and fruit at 3 untreated orchards in Ventura County, as part of a continual long-term study.
Determine the relationships between avocado thrips populations of leaves and fruit and scarring on fruit at these orchards.
Determine the abundance of predators on leaves and fruit in these orchards and relate to them to avocado thrips populations.

Summary

Spray volume when applying Veratran D (sabadilla). Three trials using sabadilla (12-25 lbs/acre) plus sugar in volumes of 40-210 gallons per acre (gpa) were conducted from April through June 1999 at sites in Santa Paula, Ventura County, with 'Hass' avocados in commercial orchards on level terrain. One used small (3-m tall) trees and two used large (6-9-m tall) trees. Trials were conducted using a randomized block design, usually composed of three replicates of six treatments each (including the control). Treatments were blocked on pre-treatment numbers of thrips larvae/leaf. Plots were divided evenly into those with lowest, intermediate, and highest numbers, and numbers from the three groups matched to produce similar means. Treatments were randomly assigned within these three groups afterwards. In all volume trials, a helicopter with a 32-ft long boom, with 32 nozzles, was used to make applications. A single pass was made over the one row, 6-17 tree-long replicates. Water-sensitive papers were stapled on leaves to determine spray coverage.

Results of these trials indicated that on small trees with 20 ft spacing, 40 gpa was sufficient to reduce thrips larval populations on leaves. However, in both large tree trials, data indicated that this volume was insufficient. Rather, volumes of 85-125 gpa seemed necessary for effective control. Regardless of volume, effects of sabadilla lasted only 6-13 days. There were positive regressions between spray volume and spray coverage, with greater spray volume producing greater coverage.

Spray volume when applying Agri-Mek (abamectin). Seven aerial spray volume trials using abamectin were conducted in Ventura County from July 1999-May 2000. One was conducted on small (2-3-m tall) trees, one on medium (4-m tall) trees, and five on large (6-8-m tall) trees. Volumes tested ranged from 50-150 gpa, but were usually 50 or 100 gpa. Abamectin was applied as Agri-Mek 0.15EC at 10 or 20 oz/acre with 1% NR 415 oil, and in some trials with Silwet, an organosilicone surfactant. Application methods and equipment were essentially the same as in the sabadilla studies.

The overall results indicated that a high rate of abamectin (20 oz Agri-Mek/a) in an aerial spray volume of 50 gpa delivered via helicopter can reduce larval thrips populations on lower leaves of small, medium, and large (approx. 6 m-tall) trees. However, on the largest (>8-m tall), closed-canopied trees, applying neither 50 nor 100 gpa seems reliable for effective control (at least at 10 oz Agri-Mek/acre) because these spray volumes were insufficient to penetrate the canopy to reach the lower levels. In these situations, it was not surprising that applying even 100 gpa can be ineffective. It appeared that spray coverage of <10% on the bottom of a leaf surface was usually ineffective in causing high mortality when a low abamectin rate was used. To obtain consistent results on these large trees, a volume > 100 gpa may greatly increase spray coverage and probably result in increased efficacy. However, because of costs to growers, such a volume is generally considered impractical for routine helicopter applications and thus was included in only one trial of our study. High spray coverage on large trees would best be accomplished by opening up tight canopies and using 50 gpa.

Efficacy of aerial applications using Success and Agri-Mek. One trial using air applications of Success 2SC (spinosad) and Agri-Mek 0.15 EC (abamectin) and 2 trials using these and a backpack spinosad application were made against S. perseae on small (2.2 m-tall), medium (4-5 m-tall), and large (6-8 m-tall) avocado trees in Ventura County, CA in 1999 and 2000. In all trials, 1% NR 415 oil was added. In the small tree trial only, the organosilicone surfactant Silwet was added.

On small trees, both chemicals in 468 and 935 l/ha (50 and 100 gpa) spray volumes were equally effective when applied by air against S. perseae larvae on leaves 20-27 days after treatment (DAT) (Table 1). Adult numbers were generally unaffected by treatments.

On medium trees, air applications of spinosad (83 and 167 ml AI/ha) (5 and 10 oz/acre) were less effective than of abamectin (14 and 28 ml AI/ha) (10 and 20 oz/acre) in a 701 l/ha (75 gpa) spray volume when made approximately 2 weeks before fruit set. The backpack spinosad treatment was the most effective treatment 3-10 days after treatment (DAT), but air abamectin treatments were equally effective 17 DAT. This was generally true when determined by numbers of larvae (Table 2) and adults (Table 3) on leaves and numbers of larvae (Table 4) on fruit. There generally were no differences on numbers of adults on fruit (Table 5). Fruit lengths were not affected by treatments (Table 6), but scarring of fruit was lowest in the abamectin treatments (Table 7). Percentages of fruit with economic scars at 79 DAT ranked (highest to lowest) as follows: control > spinosad air at 5 oz/acre (83 ml AI/ha) > spinosad air at 10 oz/acre (167 ml AI/ha) > spinosad backpack at 10 oz/acre > abamectin air at 10 oz/acre (14 ml AI/ha) = abamectin air at 20 oz/acre (28 ml AI/ha). Predatory mite and predatory thrips numbers on leaves were slightly reduced, especially by the backpack spinosad treatment, but populations recovered after 17 DAT (Tables 8 and 9).

Results on large trees (Table 10) were similar to those in the medium tree trial. In addition, persea mite, Oligonychus perseae, numbers were reduced by air abamectin, air spinosad and backpack spinosad applications (Table 11).

Our results suggest that air spinosad and abamectin applications are equally effective against S. perseae, but the ability of spinosad to prevent scarring on fruit may be more dependent on precise timing of application because abamectin results in longer control. However, when applied by backpack on medium trees approximately 2 weeks before fruit set or on large trees, spinosad is nearly as or as effective as air abamectin treatments in protecting fruit against S. perseae damage.

Population trends of avocado thrips on leaves and fruit. In 2000, we continued to see a similar pattern of thrips infestations on leaves and fruit compared with 1998 and 1999. Thrips larvae were found at significantly higher densities on leaves than fruit early in the season, but densities on fruit reached levels seen on leaves later in the season (Table 12). As in previous years, this seemed related to the hardening of leaves.

Relationships between avocado thrips populations of leaves and fruit and scarring on fruit. In 2000, we continued to follow thrips populations and relate them to scarring on fruit. Unlike in 1998 and 1999, there seemed to no positive relationship between numbers on leaves and scarring on fruit, at least between 2 orchards. At Moore on June 13, there were only 2.72 larvae/leaf, but scarring on July 25 was 19.8%; at Hutter on June 14, there were 6.38 larvae/leaf, but scarring was only 16.9% (Table 12). The apparent lack of relationship seemed related to the asynchronous fruit development; fruit appearing later were subject to higher damage because little young growth was present to keep thrips off the fruit.

Abundance of predators on leaves and fruit. In 2000, populations of predators on leaves in these orchards continued to be low (Table 13), as in 1998 and 1999. A major difference between 2000 and the previous two years was the lack of adult predatory thrips in 2000, and in the relatively high densities of lacewings (0.0107/leaf in 2000 compared with 0.0014/leaf averaged over 1998 and 1999). As in 1998 and 1999, only a few predatory thrips and lacewings were found on fruit.

Most important things learned in 1999-2000 season were:

Sabadilla was effective in a 40 gpa spray volume when applied by air on small trees, but >85 gpa were needed on large trees to effectively reduce thrips numbers at lower tree levels.
Abamectin was effective in a 50 gpa spray volume when applied by air on small, medium, and large trees. However, such a low volume on large trees often results in low coverage. Under such a situation, highest thrips mortality may be delayed for up to three weeks. On the very largest, close-canopied trees, a volume of 100 gpa was ineffective in reducing thrips populations at lower tree levels. These closed-canopied orchards need to be opened up for successful avocado thrips control.
Success is less effective in preventing scarring of fruit than Agri-Mek when applied by air two weeks before fruit set. Backpack application of Success two weeks before fruit set is almost as or as effective as air application of Agri-Mek.
For Success to be as effective as Agri-Mek when applied by air, applications may need to be made closer to the time of fruit set, or perhaps even right after fruit set, as long as spray coverage is sufficient.
Continued monitoring of thrips populations on fruit and leaves seemed to confirm that thrips prefer leaves over fruit.
The relationship between thrips populations and scarring on fruit may be even more complex than once thought, because simple population-scarring predictions may not hold true when there is asynchrony in fruit set as experienced this year, 2000. Numbers of larvae >3/leaf can be related to 20% scarring under conditions of asynchronous fruit set.
Continued monitoring of predator abundance in orchards seemed to confirm that naturally-occurring predators persist at densities too low for effective thrips control.

Background Reading

Hoddle, M. S. and J. G. Morse. 1997. Avocado thrips: a serious new pest of avocados in California. Avocado Society Yearbook. 81: 81-90.

Machlitt, D. 1998. Persea mite on avocados - a quick field counting method. Subtropical Fruit Notes. 6: 1-4.

Morse, J. G., M. S. Hoddle, M. Hand, M. Nyberg, A. A. Urena, T. Roberts, and S. Peirce. 1999. Pesticide efficacy trial. Results of a 1998 avocado thrips pesticide efficacy trial near Fallbrook. Publication of the California Avocado Commission. Santa Ana, CA, 8 pp.

Phillips, P. A. and B. A. Faber. 1995. Persea mite trial. California Avocado Society Yearbook. 79: 197-200.

Phillips, P. A. and B. A. Faber. 1998. Avocado thrips subproject 2: pesticide evaluation and phenology in the field. In California Avocado Research Symposium, University of California, Riverside, pp. 21-22.

Phillips, P. A. R. S. Bekey, and J. B. Bailey. 1995. Early harvest to manage greenhouse thrips on avocado, pp. 419-422. In B. L. Parker et al. [eds.], Thrips biology and management. Plenum Press, New York.

Sparks, T. C., G. D. Thompson, H.A. Kirst, M. B. Hertlein, L. L. Larson, T. V. Worden, and S. T. Thibault. 1998. Biological activity of the spinosyns, new fermentation derived insect control agents, on tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. J. Econ. Entomol. 91: 1277-1283.

Table 1. Trial 1: Mean numbers of S. perseae larvae and adults/leaf ± SE (60 leaves/replicate, 3 replicates) and results of analyses of variance (ANOVA) and LSD multiple comparisons from spinosad (S, 167 ml AI/ha) - abamectin (A, 28 ml AI/ha) trial in Santa Paula, CA, August 24-September 22, 1999. Means with different letters within rows are significantly different (P < 0.05). 468, 935 = l/ha spray volume.

Date

DAT^a

Control

S, 468

S, 935

A, 468

A, 935

F ^b

Larvae

Aug 24

-2

4.40 ± 1.04a

4.23 ± 0.44a

4.85 ± 1.30a

4.62 ± 1.25a

4.80 ± 1.13a

0.32

0.8562

5.04 ± 0.82a

0.62 ± 0.20b

0.53 ± 0.35b

2.04 ± 0.36b

0.75 ± 0.20b

21.40

0.0002

Sep 2

5.66 ± 0.56a

1.66 ± 0.56b

1.68 ± 0.77b

3.25 ± 0.08ab

1.88 ± 0.54b

7.31

0.0088

3.94 ± 1.04a

1.96 ± 0.51a

2.58 ± 0.96a

3.69 ± 0.87a

2.24 ± 0.56a

1.86

0.2114

2.73 ± 1.04a

0.52 ± 0.18b

0.67 ± 0.35b

0.44 ± 0.12b

0.45 ± 0.05b

5.87

0.0166

2.84 ± 1.23a

0.26 ± 0.14b

0.28 ± 0.15b

0.16 ± 0.08b

0.13 ± 0.04b

11.61

0.0021

Adults

Aug 24

-2

0.56 ± 0.13a

0.46 ± 0.05a

0.62 ± 0.07a

0.81 ± 0.13a

4.80 ± 1.13a

1.51

0.2872

0.30 ± 0.82a

0.03 ± 0.01b

0.07 ± 0.03b

0.13 ± 0.10b

0.75 ± 0.20b

5.89

0.0165

Sep 2

0.33 ± 0.20a

0.19 ± 0.13a

0.16 ± 0.11a

0.27 ± 0.17a

0.22 ± 0.07a

0.74

0.5903

0.22 ± 0.11a

0.06 ± 0.02a

0.07 ± 0.02a

0.13 ± 0.10a

0.07 ± 0.02a

1.08

0.4284

0.20 ± 0.08a

0.04 ± 0.02a

0.11 ± 0.05a

0.07 ± 0.06a

0.11 ± 0.06a

1.91

0.2023

0.41 ± 0.15a

0.11 ± 0.05a

0.24 ± 0.16a

0.13 ± 0.13a

0.16 ± 0.07a

1.69

0.2453

^aDays after treament.
^bAll df = 4, 8.

Table 2. Trial 2: Mean numbers of S. perseae larvae/leaf ± SE (60 leaves/replicate, 3 replicates) and results of analyses of variance (ANOVA) and LSD multiple comparisons from spinosad (S) - abamectin (A) trial in Santa Paula, CA, May 16-August 10, 2000. Means with different letters within rows are significantly different (P < 0.05). 83, 167, 14, and 28 = ml AI/ha.

Date

DAT^a

Control

S-83
Air

S-167
Air

A-14
Air

A-28
Air

S-67
Backpack

F ^b

May 16-18

-7 to -5

16.4 ± 6.3a

16.3 ± 2.6a

16.8 ± 2.2a

16.9 ± 4.8a

16.2 ± 3.6a

16.3 ± 4.6a

0.55

0.733

12.2 ± 5.0a

2.3 ± 0.7b

2.0 ± 0.8bc

2.3 ± 0.7b

2.0 ± 0.3bc

0.4 ± 0.2c

11.25

0.0008

16.4 ± 6.0a

8.7 ± 2.4b

6.3 ± 1.4bc

5.2 ± 2.0bc

3.4 ± 0.7c

0.7 ± 0.3d

14.85

0.0002

June 2

16.9 ± 7.6a

12.4 ± 2.7ab

9.1 ± 1.6ab

7.9 ± 2.6ab

5.3 ± 1.1b

0.6 ± 0.1c

8.16

0.0026

14.5 ± 6.4a

5.9 ± 1.2b

4.8 ± 1.0bc

1.7 ± 0.5cd

0.7 ± 0.2d

0.4 ± 0.1d

14.77

0.0002

24.2 ± 7.6a

8.7 ± 2.9b

4.1 ± 1.1b

0.8 ± 0.4c

0.2 ± 0.1c

23.14

<0.0001

19.5 ± 8.1a

12.3 ± 2.8ab

10.7 ± 2.2ab

1.9 ± 0.5c

1.2 ± 0.3c

4.6 ± 1.1bc

6.36

0.0066

July 5

43^c

12.1 ± 4.0a

10.2 ± 3.7ab

15.9 ± 4.4a

3.9 ± 0.7b

3.8 ± 1.2b

9.1 ± 2.3ab

3.36

0.0488

49^c

12.2 ± 5.6a

7.5 ± 2.3a

8.9 ± 1.0a

2.9 ± 1.4a

1.8 ± 0.5a

6.8 ± 2.9a

2.40

0.1118

65^d

13.2 ± 5.2a

7.5 ± 3.2ab

5.6 ± 1.8abc

3.9 ± 2.2bc

1.6 ± 0.2c

6.4 ± 2.1abc

3.38

0.0477

Aug 10

79^d

11.4 ± 5.0a

7.8 ± 2.8a

14.5 ± 3.4a

6.6 ± 0.6a

4.6 ± 1.4a

16.6 ± 7.0a

2.51

0.1010

^aDays after treament.
^bAll df = 5, 10.
^cN = 30 leaves/replicate.
^dN = 20 leaves/replicate.

Table 3. Trial 2: Mean numbers of S. perseae adults/leaf ± SE (60 leaves/replicate, 3 replicates) and results of analyses of variance (ANOVA) and LSD multiple comparisons from spinosad (S) - abamectin (A) trial in Santa Paula, CA, May 16-August 10, 2000. Means with different letters within rows are significantly different (P < 0.05). 83, 167, 14, and 28 = ml AI/ha.

Date

DAT^a

Control

S-83
Air

S-167
Air

A-14
Air

A-28
Air

S-167
Backpack

F ^b

May 16-18

-7 to -5

0.89 ± 0.03a

1.15 ± 0.14a

0.84 ± 0.22a

1.05 ± 0.24a

1.10 ± 012a

0.89 ± 0.14a

0.48

0.7810

1.59 ± 0.42a

0.40 ± 0.12b

0.25 ± 0.08bc

0.54 ± 0.13b

0.58 ± 0.04b

0.06 ± 0.03c

10.24

0.0011

1.78 ± 0.26a

0.88 ± 0.12b

0.84 ± 0.11b

0.89 ± 0.28b

0.70 ± 0.06b

0.18 ± 0.04c

11.05

0.0008

June 2

1.38 ± 0.40a

1.02 ± 0.28ab

0.62 ± 0.05bc

0.51 ± 0.06bc

0.46 ± 0.03c

0.10 ± 0.04d

9.63

0.0014

1.28 ± 0.24a

0.56 ± 0.13b

0.27 ± 0.06bc

0.10 ± 0.01c

0.15 ± 0.09c

0.17 ± 0.06c

10.54

0.0010

1.11 ± 0.44a

1.16 ± 0.14a

0.61 ± 0.05ab

0.22 ± 0.03b

0.26 ± 0.11b

0.54 ± 0.25ab

3.72

0.0366

1.13 ± 0.32a

0.44 ± 0.12b

0.42 ± 0.11b

0.17 ± 0.04c

0.18 ± 0.04c

0.43 ± 0.06b

13.81

0.0003

July 5

43^c

1.03 ± 0.36a

0.77 ± 0.25ab

0.38 ± 0.01bc

0.19 ± 0.02cd

0.06 ± 0.01d

0.20 ± 0.05cd

6.75

0.0053

49^c

0.92 ± 0.34a

0.50 ± 0.15a

0.50 ± 0.18a

0.22 ± 0.12a

0.08 ± 0.04a

0.42 ± 0.14a

2.44

0.1082

65^d

0.70 ± 0.25a

0.62 ± 0.25a

0.53 ± 0.06a

0.35 ± 0.14a

0.17 ± 0.06a

0.50 ± 0.23a

1.35

0.3208

Aug 10

79^d

0.87 ± 0.33a

0.90 ± 0.10a

2.12 ± 0.88b

0.92 ± 0.18a

0.48 ± 0.16a

1.08 ± 0.31ab

3.35

0.0491

^aDays after treament.
^bAll df = 5, 10.
^cN = 30 leaves/replicate.
^dN = 20 leaves/replicate.

Table 4. Trial 2: Mean numbers of S. perseae larvae/fruit ± SE (30 fruit/replicate, 3 replicates) and results of analyses of variance and LSD multiple comparisons from spinosad (S) - abamectin (A) trial in Santa Paula, CA, June 2-August 10, 2000. Means with different letters within rows are significantly different (P < 0.05). 83, 167, 14, and 28 = ml AI/ha.

Date

DAT^a

Control

S-83
Air

S-167
Air

A-14
Air

A-28
Air

S-167
Backpack

F ^b

June 2

10c

0.07 ± 0.03

0.07

0.00 ± 0.00

0.03

0.00

0.00 ± 0.00

----

-----

0.13 ± 0.02a

0.10 ± 0.02a

0.03 ± 0.02bc

0.06 ± 0.01ab

0.01 ± 0.01cd

0.00 ± 0.00d

9.70

0.0014

0.18 ± 0.08a

0.09 ± 0.07ab

0.00 ± 0.00c

0.01 ± 0.01bc

0.00 ± 0.00c

7.74

0.0032

34^d

1.30 ± 0.60a

0.53 ± 0.42ab

0.38 ± 0.15abc

0.03 ± 0.03bc

0.01 ± 0.01c

0.07 ± 0.05bc

5.08

0.0142

July 3

1.78 ± 1.31a

1.18 ± 0.80a

1.48 ± 0.85a

0.11 ± 0.10a

0.03 ± 0.02a

0.54 ± 0.28a

1.46

0.2841

48^e

2.01 ± 1.40a

1.11 ± 0.98a

1.54 ± 0.66a

0.09 ± 0.06a

0.00 ± 0.00a

0.91 ± 0.39a

1.06

0.4375

63^f

4.20 ± 3.09a

1.75 ± 1.30a

1.63 ± 0.53a

0.53 ± 0.23a

0.40 ± 0.18a

0.97 ± 0.32a

1.76

0.2093

Aug 10

79^f

2.37 ± 1.35a

1.90 ± 1.00a

2.80 ± 0.48a

0.99 ± 0.59a

0.58 ± 0.32a

1.97 ± 1.05a

1.47

0.2806

^aDays after treament.
^bAll df = 5, 10.
^c1 -3 replicates per treatment; data not analyzed.
^dN= 60 fruit/replicate
^eN = 20-30 fruit/replicate.
^fN = 12-20 fruit/replicate.

Table 5. Trial 2: Mean numbers of S. perseae adults/fruit ± SE (30 fruit/replicate, 3 replicates) and results of analyses of variance (ANOVA) and LSD multiple comparisons from spinosad (S) - abamectin (A) trial in Santa Paula, CA, June 2-August 10, 2000. Means with different letters within rows are significantly different (P < 0.05). 83, 167, 14, and 28 = ml AI/ha.

Date

DAT^a

Control

S-83
Air

S-167
Air

A-14
Air

A-28
Air

S-167
Backpack

F ^b

June 2

10^c

0.00 ± 0.00

0.07

0.00 ± 0.00

0.00

0.03

0.02 ± 0.01

----

-----

0.04 ± 0.03a

0.00 ± 0.00a

3.29

0.0514

0.04 ± 0.03a

0.03 ± 0.02a

0.02 ± 0.01a

0.00 ± 0.00a

0.01 ± 0.01a

1.09

0.4228

34^d

0.13 ± 0.07a

0.11 ± 0.09a

0.06 ± 0.03a

0.01 ± 0.01a

0.02 ± 0.00a

0.06 ± 0.03a

1.66

0.2320

July 3

0.24 ± 0.12a

0.13 ± 0.05a

0.10 ± 0.04a

0.09 ± 0.03ab

0.03 ± 0.03b

0.09 ± 0.03ab

3.64

0.0389

48^e

0.21 ± 0.12a

0.11 ± 0.10a

0.13 ± 0.06a

0.01 ± 0.01a

0.00 ± 0.00a

0.09 ± 0.04a

1.52

0.2669

63^f

0.15 ± 0.10a

0.13 ± 0.02a

0.35 ± 0.08a

0.05 ± 0.03a

0.13 ± 0.07a

0.25 ± 0.00a

2.11

0.1475

Aug 10

79^f

0.07 ± 0.07a

0.10 ± 0.10a

0.21 ± 0.08a

0.05 ± 0.05a

0.11 ± 0.07a

0.14 ± 0.04a

0.62

0.6887

^aDays after treament.
^bAll df = 5, 10.
^c1 -3 replicates per treatment; data not analyzed.
^dN = 60 fruit/replicate.
^eN = 20-30 fruit/plot.
^fN = 12-20 fruit/plot.

Table 6. Trial 2: Mean fruit lengths (cm) ± SE (30 fruit/replicate, 3 replicates) and results of analyses of variance (ANOVA) and LSD multiple comparisons from spinosad (S) - abamectin (A) trial in Santa Paula, CA, June 8-August 10, 2000. There were no significant differences within rows. 83, 167, 14, and 28 = ml AI/ha.

Date

DAT^a

Control

S-83
Air

S-167
Air

A-14
Air

A-28
Air

S-167
Backpack

F ^b

June 8

0.51 ± 0.50

0.50 ± 0.02

0.46 ± 0.02

0.49 ± 0.02

0.50 ± 0.07

0.51 ± 0.03

0.19

0.9576

0.62 ± 0.07

0.60 ± 0.04

0.57 ± 0.04

0.60 ± 0.03

0.59 ± 0.06

0.29

0.9093

34^c

1.04 ± 0.19

0.94 ± 0.25

0.93 ± 0.07

0.94 ± 0.05

1.00 ± 0.16

0.95 ± 0.10

0.13

0.9825

July 3

1.63 ± 0.36

1.24 ± 0.25

1.47 ± 0.26

1.62 ± 0.08

1.56 ± 0.23

1.49 ± 0.25

0.65

0.6679

48^d

1.95 ± 0.33

2.01 ± 0.16

2.09 ± 0.09

2.12 ± 0.15

2.15 ± 0.12

1.98 ± 0.08

0.23

0.9394

63^e

3.24 ± 0.62

2.95 ± 0.74

3.65 ± 0.32

3.34 ± 0.71

3.69 ± 0.30

3.43 ± 0.35

0.25

0.9289

Aug 10

79^e

4.34 ± 0.49

4.15 ± 0.35

5.18 ± 0.22

4.81 ± 0.44

5.44 ± 0.48

5.19 ± 0.39

1.40

0.3027

^aDays after treament.
^bAll df = 5, 10.
^cN = 60 fruit/plot.
^dN = 20-30 fruit/replicate.
^eN = 12-20 fruit/replicate.

Table 7. Trial 2: Mean percentage of fruit with scars ± SE (x 100) and mean percentage with economic scarring damage ± SE (30 fruit/replicate) caused by S. perseae and results of analyses of variance (ANOVA) and LSD multiple comparisons from spinosad (S) - abamectin (A) trial in Santa Paula, CA, June 8-August 10, 2000. Means with different letters within rows are significantly different (P < 0.05). 83, 167, 14, and 28 = ml AI/ha.

Mean Percentage of Fruit with Scars

Date

DAT^a

Control

S-83
Air

S-167
Air

A-14
Air

A-28
Air

S-167
Backpack

F ^b

June 8

0 ± 0

----

-----

3 ± 3a

4 ± 1a

0 ± 0a

1 ± 1a

0 ± 0a

2.98

0.0668

34^c

33 ± 15a

17 ± 12ab

11 ± 2abc

2 ± 1cd

1 ± 1d

2 ± 1bcd

5.96

0.0083

July 3

47 ± 20a

24 ± 8ab

20 ± 8abc

4 ± 1bc

2 ± 1c

14 ± 3abc

4.01

0.0294

48^d

52 ± 12a

37 ± 10a

32 ± 4a

6 ± 3b

3 ± 2b

13 ± 5b

7.36

0.0039

63^e

55 ± 13a

42 ± 17ab

33 ± 6abc

10 ± 8c

8 ± 4c

13 ± 4bc

3.74

0.0361

Aug 10

79^e

50 ± 10a

49 ± 10a

52 ± 4a

30 ± 2a

27 ± 8a

33 ± 8a

2.09

0.1502

Mean Percentage with Economic Scarring Damage

Date

DAT^a

Control

S-83
Air

S-167
Air

A-14
Air

A-28
Air

S-167
Backpack

F ^b

June 8

0 ± 0

----

-----

1 ± 1a

2 ± 1a

0 ± 0a

1 ± 1a

0 ± 0a

1.82

0.1969

34^c

21 ± 11a

9 ± 6ab

7 ± 2bc

1 ± 1d

0 ± 0d

1 ± 1cd

8.44

0.0023

July 3

33 ± 14a

17 ± 8ab

14 ± 6ab

2 ± 2c

0 ± 0c

4 ± 2bc

5.90

0.0086

48^d

29 ± 13a

21 ± 10ab

18 ± 6ab

2 ± 2cd

0 ± 0d

6 ± 2bc

9.31

0.0016

63^e

18 ± 7a

18 ± 13a

8 ± 6a

3 ± 2a

0 ± 0a

2 ± 2a

3.20

0.0555

Aug 10

79^e

24 ± 9a

20 ± 10a

14 ± 4a

2 ± 2a

9 ± 2a

3.01

0.0651

^aDays after treament.
^bAll df = 5, 10.
^cN = 60 fruit/replicate.
^dN = 20-30 fruit/replicate.
^eN = 12-20 fruit/replicate.

Table 8. Trial 2: Mean numbers of predatory mites ± SE (60 leaves/replicates, 3 replicates) and results of analyses of variance (ANOVA) and LSD multiple comparisons from spinosad (S) - abamectin (A) trial in Santa Paula, CA, May 16-August 10, 2000. Means with different letters within rows are significantly different (P < 0.05). 83, 167, 14, and 28 = ml AI/ha.

Date

DAT^a

Control

S-83
Air

S-167
Air

A-14
Air

A-28
Air

S-167
Backpack

F ^b

May 16-18

-5 to -7

0.48 ± 0.16a

0.53 ± 0.21a

0.61 ± 0.02a

0.85 ± 0.17a

0.52 ± 0.23a

0.57 ± 0.18a

0.82

0.5600

0.82 ± 0.34a

0.45 ± 0.11a

0.64 ± 0.18a

0.65 ± 0.16a

0.36 ± 0.15ab

0.07 ± 0.03b

3.42

0.0465

0.94 ± 0.41ab

0.65 ± 0.31ab

0.88 ± 0.10a

0.79 ± 0.28ab

0.28 ± 0.12bc

0.12 ± 0.07c

3.54

0.0420

June 2

0.79 ± 0.36ab

0.65 ± 0.27ab

0.89 ± 0.17a

0.57 ± 0.10ab

0.23 ± 0.13bc

0.07 ± 0.01c

3.93

0.0313

0.31 ± 0.15a

0.23 ± 0.11a

0.35 ± 0.04a

0.27 ± 0.13a

0.11 ± 0.07a

0.10 ± 0.04a

0.94

0.4937

0.35 ± 0.19a

0.36 ± 0.20a

0.45 ± 0.07a

0.49 ± 0.12a

0.23 ± 0.17a

0.18 ± 0.09a

0.99

0.4688

0.16 ± 0.08a

0.14 ± 0.10a

0.21 ± 0.09a

0.16 ± 0.07a

0.08 ± 0.07a

0.18 ± 0.04a

0.73

0.6187

July 5

43^c

0.12 ± 0.08a

0.08 ± 0.06a

0.09 ± 0.04a

0.07 ± 0.05a

0.06 ± 0.06a

0.10 ± 0.03a

0.39

0.8441

49^c

0.07 ± 0.03a

0.10 ± 0.06a

0.10 ± 0.03a

0.07 ± 0.04a

0.03 ± 0.03a

0.02 ± 0.02a

0.81

0.5683

65^d

0.00 ± 0.00a

0.03 ± 0.03a

0.02 ± 0.02a

0.05 ± 0.05a

0.00 ± 0.00a

0.02 ± 0.02a

0.54

0.7424

Aug 10

79^d

0.05 ± 0.03a

0.02 ± 0.02a

0.08 ± 0.03a

0.02 ± 0.02a

0.00 ± 0.00a

0.02 ± 0.02a

1.74

0.2129

^aDays after treament.
^bAll df = 5, 10.
^cN = 30 leaves/replicate.
^dN = 20 leaves/replicate.

Table 9. Trial 2: Mean numbers of predatory thrips ± SE (60 leaves/replicate, 3 replicates) and results of analyses of variance (ANOVA) and LSD multiple comparisons from spinosad (S) - abamectin (A) trial in Santa Paula, CA, May 16-August 10, 2000. Means with different letters within rows are significantly different (P < 0.05). 83, 167, 14, and 28 = ml AI/ha.

Date

DAT^a

Control

S-83
Air

S-167
Air

A-14
Air

A-28
Air

S-167
Backpack

F ^b

May 16-18

-5 to -7

0.04 ± 0.02a

0.03 ± 0.01a

0.03 ± 0.02a

0.03 ± 0.01a

0.07

0.9951

0.06 ± 0.02ab

0.03 ± 0.02abc

0.02 ± 0.02bc

0.07 ± 0.02a

0.02 ± 0.00bc

0.01 ± 0.01c

3.63

0.0393

0.10 ± 0.02a

0.03 ± 0.01a

0.06 ± 0.02a

0.05 ± 0.02a

0.02 ± 0.01a

3.19

0.0559

June 2

0.14 ± 0.04a

0.08 ± 0.04a

0.12 ± 0.03a

0.13 ± 0.03a

0.10 ± 0.02a

0.04 ± 0.02a

1.52

0.2665

0.21 ± 0.09a

0.06 ± 0.01a

0.07 ± 0.01a

0.08 ± 0.01a

0.04 ± 0.02a

0.03 ± 0.02a

3.22

0.0544

0.07 ± 0.02a

0.08 ± 0.01a

0.01 ± 0.01a

0.04 ± 0.02a

0.02 ± 0.00a

0.01 ± 0.01a

3.04

0.0634

0.01 ± 0.01a

0.03 ± 0.01a

0.01 ± 0.01a

0.00 ± 0.00a

0.01 ± 0.01a

2.40

0.1119

July 5

43^c

0.02 ± 0.02a

0.03 ± 0.02a

0.00 ± 0.00a

0.01 ± 0.01a

1.92

0.1785

49^c

0.02 ± 0.02a

0.00 ± 0.00a

0.35

0.8723

65^d

0.00 ± 0.00

-----

Aug 10

79^d

0.00 ± 0.00a

0.02 ± 0.02a

0.03 ± 0.03a

0.02 ± 0.02a

0.19

0.9578

^aDays after treament.
^bAll df = 5, 10.
^cN = 30 leaves/replicate.
^dN = 20 leaves/replicate.

Table 10. Trial 3: Mean numbers of S. perseae larvae and adults ± SE (30 leaves/replicate, 3 replicates) and results of analyses of variance (ANOVA) and LSD multiple comparisons from spinosad (S) - abamectin (A) trial in Santa Paula, CA, August 29, 2000-September 15, 2000. Means with different letters within rows are significantly different (P < 0.05). 167 and 28 = ml AI/ha.

Date	DAT^a	Control	S-167^b Air	A-28 Air	S-167 Backpack	*F ^c*	P
S. perseae Larvae
Aug 21	-8	2.73 ± 0.29a	4.85 ± 0.78a	4.18 ± 0.19a	4.70 ± 1.29a	1.30	0.3589
25	-4	3.48 ± 0.28a	4.92 ± 1.81a	5.01 ± 1.26a	3.88 ± 1.73a	0.36	0.7823
Sept 1	3	8.51 ± 2.50a	3.09 ± 0.48b	3.74 ± 1.37b	0.06 ± 0.03c	21.67	0.0013
5	7	8.29 ± 1.92a	6.15 ± 1.91ab	3.42 ± 1.00b	0.27 ± 0.02c	25.80	0.0008
15	17	5.57 ± 2.10a	2.24 ± 0.56b	0.74 ± 0.49bc	0.13 ± 0.05c	18.22	0.0020
S. perseae Adults
Aug 21	-8	1.61 ± 0.33a	1.67 ± 0.55a	1.98 ± 0.04a	1.82 ± 0.46a	0.32	0.8127
25	-4	0.90 ± 0.38a	1.22 ± 0.29a	1.07 ± 0.03a	1.05 ± 0.51a	0.41	0.7549
Sept 1	3	1.25 ± 0.55a	0.70 ± 0.22a	0.51 ± 0.10ab	0.10 ± 0.04b	6.74	0.0238
5	7	1.68 ± 0.36a	0.91 ± 0.26a	1.36 ± 0.58a	0.34 ± 0.14a	4.30	0.0610
15	17	2.49 ± 0.39a