Effect of Girdling on Fruit Set of Fuerte Avocado Variety
Costas Gregoriou
Research Officer, Agricultural Research Institute,
Nicosia, Republic of Cypress
Summary
Girdling of Fuerte
avocados before blossom, at full blossom, and after full blossom for four
consecutive years did not affect the cambial growth of the trees. Although
there were no significant differences in yields among the different treatments,
girdling before blossoming gave in all four years higher yields. Individual
fruit weight was lower when girdling was done before blossoming, compared to
the other treatments. The number of seedless fruits was not affected by
girdling.
Introduction
Unsatisfactory bearing has always been a
major commercial problem in avocado trees (Coit,
1921). Yields too often bear little relationship to the usually excellent
vegetative growth and flowering, especially in the Fuerte
avocado variety (Trochoulias and O'Neil, 1976).
No satisfactory solution to this problem has
yet been obtained. Girdling has been practiced to increase productivity in some
deciduous fruit trees (Griggs and Schrader, 1941) and in citrus (Rackham, 1966). Girdling commonly induces increased amounts
of elaborated plant materials and of growth substances in the branch girdled,
and presumably induces conditions more favorable for fruit set development (Murneek, 1941).
Girdling of avocado branches has been tried
with different cultivars of avocado, but mainly with Fuerte,
since shy bearing is one of the major problems with that cultivar. The results
were promising, and it was found that girdling increased the yield of avocados
in
No work has been reported in
Materials and Methods
Trees of the variety Fuerte
on Mexican rootstock were used. The trees, 8 years old, were selected to be
uniform in size and vigor at the Kouklia Government
Farm of the Department of Agriculture.
The soil was a well drained sandy-clay loam
with a CaCO3 content of 35% and a pH of 8.2 (measured on a 1:2.5 soil:water suspension). The area has an average annual rainfall of 420 mm, mainly during the
period October to April, and mean maximum air temperatures ranging from
17 °C to 33°C in July, with mean minima from 0°C to 21°C. Relative humidity
ranges between 70% to 80% during the winter months, and from
60% to 70% in the summer. The trees were irrigated by mini-sprinklers
and the water used — obtained from boreholes — had a pH of 7.3 and an
electrical conductivity of 0.8 mmhos/cm. Annual
spring fertilizer dressings of 3kg ammonium sulphate,
0.5 kg triple super-phosphate, and 1 kg potassium sulphate
were applied. The orchard was cultivated with rotavators
to suppress weeds, and the trees were pruned as required.
The treatment combinations used were: 1)
girdling before blossom (December), 2) girdling at full blossom (April), 3)
girdling after full blossom (May), and 4) control (no girdling). As many as half of the main branches of each tree were girdled by
removing a band of bark (5 mm wide) down to the wood. The same branches
in each tree were girdled in four consecutive years (1982-85).
A randomized complete block design with five
replications was used, each replication consisting of one tree. Fruit weight,
total yield, and trunk circumference measured at a fixed point 15 cm above the
bud union were recorded. Observations were also made on the time required for
the girdles to heal, on leaf color, and on tree growth and development.
Results and Discussion
The average growth of trees in the different
treatments, as indicated by the increase of trunk circumference, is shown in
Table 1. There was no statistical difference between treatments, indicating
that girdling of trees at different stages did not affect the cambial growth as
indicated by the increase of trunk circumference. From observations made on the
girdled branches, girdles healed within three months: and girdling can be
applied for four consecutive years on a branch without retarding wound healing.
The 'Fuerte' trees in all treatments had a spreading
habit of growth and no symptoms of leaf chlorosis due
to girdling were observed.
Annual yields per tree are also shown in
Table 1. There were no significant differences among yields of the four
treatments over the four-year period: however, girdling before blossoming gave
higher yields throughout these experiments. This is in agreement with Lahav el
al, 1971, Trochoulias and O'Neil. 1976, Bergh, 1976, and Malo, 1971, who
reported that girdling increases yields of avocado in
Mean fruit weight is shown in Table 2. In
1983, the weight of fruit of the trees on which girdling was done before
blossoming was statistically lower compared to those of the other three treatments:
whereas, in 1982 and 1984 these fruits were statistically smaller only compared
to those of the control and girdling at full blossoming. In 1985, although the
results were the same, the differences were not statistically significant. The
increase in the percentage of small fruits when girdling was applied before
full blossoming is consistent with the findings of Lahav et al, 1971 and
Trochoulias and O'Neil, 1976, who also reported that
girdling before blossoming reduced mean fruit weight. This could be an
advantage, because the market prefers medium size fruits (250g) to large ones.
Very few fruits were seedless, and their
number was not affected by girdling. This is in agreement with the findings of Trochoulias and O'Neil, 1976.
|
Table 1. Tree growth and yield of Fuerte avocados. |
|||||
|
Treatments |
Increase
in trunk circumference (cm) |
Yields
per tree (kg) |
|||
|
1981
1985 |
1982 |
1983 |
1984 |
1985 |
|
|
1) Girdling before blossoming |
9.2 |
30 |
58 |
85 |
75 |
|
2) Girdling at full blossom |
9.7 |
20 |
34 |
61 |
52 |
|
3) Girdling after full blossom |
9.4 |
20 |
24 |
71 |
60 |
|
4) Control |
9.6 |
19 |
35 |
69 |
57 |
|
S. E. |
0.7 |
4.1 |
8.3 |
13.4 |
10.6 |
|
C.V. % |
17 |
41.1 |
49.1 |
49.1 |
38.8 |
|
No significant differences were found
among treatments. |
|||||
|
Table 2. Average fruit weight of Fuerte avocados. |
||||
|
Treatments |
Mean
Fruit Weight (g) |
|||
|
1982 |
1983 |
1984 |
1985 |
|
|
1) Girdling before blossoming |
262b* |
238b |
233b |
243a |
|
2) Girdling at full blossom |
304a |
302a |
296a |
284a |
|
3) Girdling after full blossom |
289ab |
290a |
270ab |
258a |
|
4) Control |
319a |
282a |
273a |
260a |
|
S. E. |
9.3 |
11.5 |
13.8 |
13.5 |
|
C.V. % |
7.1 |
9.2 |
11.5 |
11.5 |
|
*Means in the same column bearing the same
letter are not significantly different (P<0.05). |
||||
References
Bergh.
B. O. (1976). Factors affecting avocado fruitfulness. Proc. First Internal.
Trop. Fruit Short Course, The Avocado. 83-88.
Coit. J. E.
(1921). The effect of girdling the avocado. Ann. Rpt. California Avocado Assoc. 1920. 21:69-70.
Griggs.
W. H.. and Schrader. A. L.
(1941). Effect of branch ringing before and after blossoming
on fruit set of the Delicious apples. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 38:89-90.
Lahav. E.. Gefen. B..
and Zamet. D. (1971a). The effect of girdling on the productivity of the avocado. J.
Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 96(3):396-398.
Malo. S. E.
(1971). Girdling increases avocado yields in
Murneek. A. E.
(1941). Relative carbohydrates and nitrogen concentration in new tissues
produced on ringed branches. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort.
Sci. 38:133-136.
Rackham. R. L. (1966). Girdling mature Navel
orange. Citrograph.
51:398-408.
Trochoulias. T.. and O'Neil. G. H. (1976). Girdling of
'Fuerte' avocado in subtropical