Performance
of Ettinger, Fuerte, and
Hass Cultivars of Avocado on Two Rootstocks in
C. Gregoriou and C. V.
Economides
Agricultural
Research Institute,
Summary
In a trial conducted in
Cyprus, during the first twelve years of production there were no significant
differences in the cumulative yields per tree of the avocado cultivars 'Ettinger', 'Fuerte', and 'Hass'
on 'Lula' and 'West Indian' rootstocks. Also, rootstocks did not significantly
affect the average tree size and average fruit weight of the three cultivars,
but fruits of all cultivars had significantly higher weight of stone on 'Lula'
than on 'West Indian' rootstocks. Fruits of 'Ettinger'
had significantly higher oil content on 'Lula' than on 'West Indian' rootstock,
but rootstock did not affect significantly oil content of 'Fuerte'
and 'Hass'. The trees of 'Fuerte' and 'Hass' were
spreading in habit on both rootstocks, whereas trees of 'Ettinger'
had an upright growth habit. Trees of all cultivars were most tolerant to
lime-induced chlorosis when grown on 'West Indian'
rootstock.
Introduction
The avocado (Persea
Avocado is already grown in
countries of the Mediterranean area, mainly in
The performance of three
cultivars on two rootstocks for twelve years as measured by growth, yield, and
fruit quality are presented in this paper.
Materials and Methods
The cultivars 'Fuerte', 'Ettinger', and 'Hass'
were tested on 'West Indian' and 'Lula' rootstocks. Seeds of 'West Indian' were
obtained from the University of the
The trees were raised in
the nursery by standard practice and transplanted each with a ball of soil in
April 1974 in the Government Farm of Kouklia, Paphos. The 2X3 factorial combinations were arranged in a
Randomized Complete Block design with six replications of three-tree plots of
each rootstock/cultivar combination. The spacing was 6X6m.
The soil was a well drained
sandy-clay loam with a CaCO3 content of 35% and pH of 8.2 (measured
on a 1:2.5 soil:water
suspension). The specific conductivity of a saturated soil extract at 25°C was
0.80, 1.10, and 2.00 mmhos/cm at
depths of 30, 60, and 90cm, respectively. The area has an average yearly
rainfall of 420mm, falling mainly from October to April, and mean maximum air
temperatures ranging from 17°C in July, with mean minima from 9°C to 21°C.
Relative humidity ranges from 70% to 80% during the winter months, and from 60%
to 70% in summer.
A total of about 25
irrigations were applied per year at weekly intervals during each irrigation
season. The irrigation was applied with microjet
sprinklers, the amount increasing progressively each year to reach 700 liters
of water per tree in each application. The water was obtained from a dam, and
had a pH of 7.6 and an electrical conductivity of 0.7 mmhos/cm, and contained an average of 450 ppm total soluble salts including 53 ppm
Cl, 57 ppm Mg, 134 ppm SO4, and 128 ppm
HCO3. In spring, a month before flowering, annual applications of
ammonium sulphate, triple superphosphate,
and potassium sulphate were applied, the amounts
increasing progressively each year to reach 3.0 kgs,
0.5 kg, and 1.0 kg per tree, respectively. The orchard was cultivated with rotavators to suppress weeds, and the trees were pruned as
required.
Tree size was recorded per
tree from 1979 to 1990 and always harvested in the end of November for the 'Fuerte' and 'Ettinger' and after
the middle of December for 'Hass'. Composite fruit samples for fruit weight,
weight of stone, and oil content in 1987 to 1990 consisted of 90 fruits picked
at random from all trees of each rootstock-cultivar combination. These
parameters were determined by standard methods.
Results and Discussion
Yearly mean yields per tree
of the three cultivars on the different rootstocks are presented on Table I.
There were no significant differences among the annual yields of the three
cultivars on the two rootstocks during the first twelve years of production. The
annual yields of all three cultivars seem to lack consistency, and in some
years the yield was negligible. This variability in production of the three
cultivars is probably reflecting a tendency to biennial bearing.
Also, there were no
statistically significant differences among the cumulative yields of 'Ettinger', 'Fuerte', and 'Hass'
over the first twelve years (1979-1990) of production on each one of the two
rootstocks (Table II). On the other hand, there were statistically significant
differences in the cumulative yields among the three cultivars over the two
rootstocks. The highest cumulative yield was obtained from 'Fuerte'
and the lowest, from 'Hass'. Cumulative yield of 'Ettinger'
was intermediate but did not significantly differ from that of 'Fuerte'.
The average size of the
trees of the three cultivars on the two rootstocks in 1990, as indicated by the
trunk cross-sectional areas, is given in Table II. After twelve years of growth
the two rootstocks did not significantly affect the size of trees of three
cultivars, although the largest trees of 'Fuerte'
were on 'West Indian' and of 'Hass', on 'Lula' rootstock.
The 'Fuerte'
and 'Hass' trees on both rootstocks had a spreading habit of growth, whereas 'Ettinger' had an upright habit with little spreading. The
upright growth of 'Ettinger' was a disadvantage
during harvest. It was noted that trees of all three cultivars were more
tolerant to lime-induced chlorosis on 'West Indian'
than on 'Lula' rootstock. This observation supports that of Bergh (1975), Kadman (1985), and Lopez (1985) who stated that the 'West
Indian' avocado is the most tolerant race to lime-induced chlorosis.
In
Average fruit weight,
weight of stone, and oil content of fruit for the years 1987-1990 is shown in
Table II. Rootstock did not significantly affect average weight of fruit,
although trees of 'Fuerte' and 'Ettinger'
produced the heaviest fruit on 'West Indian' and trees of 'Hass', on 'Lula'
rootstock. On the other hand, there were significant differences in the average
fruit weight among the three cultivars over the two rootstocks. Fruits of 'Ettinger' had the highest weight and fruits of 'Hass,' the
lowest. Rootstock significantly affected the average stone weight of fruit.
Fruits of all three varieties had significantly heavier stone on 'Lula' than on
'West Indian' rootstock. Also, there were significant differences in the
average weight of stone of the three cultivars over the two rootstocks. Fruits
of 'Ettinger' had the highest stone weight and fruits
of 'Hass', the lowest. Rootstock did not significantly affect the oil content
of fruit with the exception of 'Ettinger', where
fruits on 'Lula' had significantly higher oil content than fruits on 'West
Indian' rootstock. There were significant differences in the average fruit oil
content among the three cultivars over the two rootstocks. Fruits of 'Hass' had
the highest oil content (14%) and fruits of 'Fuerte',
the lowest (11.2%)
Although there were some
small differences in fruit weight, percentage of stone, and oil content of
fruits, these differences were not large enough to likely affect the market
value of the fruit. Unlike other fruits, avocados ripen after they have been
picked. The stage of maturity at harvest is very important, because immature
fruits will not ripen properly and will not attain acceptable eating quality
after harvest. In
References
Bergh, B. O. (1975). Avocado
research in
Gustafson, C. D. (1976). World
avocado production. In: Proceedings of the First International Tropical
Fruit Short Course. The Avocado, (ed. J. W. Sauls, R.
L. Philips, and L. K.Jackson), pp. 1-9.
Kadman,
A. (1985). Selection of avocado and mango rootstocks for
calcareous soils. Acta Horticulturae. No. 158,
63-67.
Lopez Jimenez, A.; Alcade Blanco, A.; Borys, M. W.; Barrera Guerra, J. L. (1985). Response of Mexican, West Indian,
and Guatemalan avocados to soils with different calcium carbonate contents. Horticulture Mexicana.
1 (1), 51-62.
Vakis,
J. N. (1982). Storage behaviour of Ettinger, Fuerte, and Hass
avocados grown on Mexican rootstock in
Vakis, N. J.; Gregoriou,
C.; and Papademetriou, M. (1985). Maturity and picking dates of
avocados under
|
Table
1. Effect of rootstock on annual
yields of ‘Ettinger’, ‘Fuerte’,
and ‘Hass’ cultivars of avocado. |
||||||||||||
|
|
Yearly mean yield per tree (kg) |
|||||||||||
|
Cultivar
/ rootstock |
1979 |
1980 |
1981 |
1982 |
1983 |
1984 |
1985 |
1986 |
1987 |
1988 |
1989 |
1990 |
|
Ettinger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lula |
1.0 |
0.3 |
1.5 |
8.3 |
21.1 |
29.7 |
34.6 |
28.4 |
29.3 |
25.8 |
47.5 |
32.2 |
|
West
Indian |
2.5 |
0.4 |
2.2 |
9.5 |
13.4 |
31.3 |
40.2 |
46.5 |
29.1 |
23.8 |
42.3 |
19.1 |
|
Mean |
1.7 |
0.3 |
1.9 |
8.9 |
17.2 |
30.5 |
37.4 |
37.4 |
29.2 |
24.8 |
45.0 |
25.6 |
|
Fuerte |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lula |
6.1 |
2.7 |
13.4 |
20.9 |
34.1 |
34.2 |
42.5 |
20.8 |
27.7 |
24.7 |
76.9 |
3.0 |
|
West
Indian |
6.1 |
4.5 |
12.4 |
23.5 |
36.5 |
29.7 |
50.0 |
26.6 |
26.5 |
17.1 |
54.1 |
6.0 |
|
Mean |
6.1 |
3.6 |
12.9 |
22.2 |
35.3 |
31.9 |
46.2 |
23.7 |
27.1 |
20.9 |
65.5 |
4.5 |
|
Hass |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lula |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
7.0 |
25.7 |
12.0 |
24.5 |
4.5 |
31.8 |
27.2 |
29.6 |
46.1 |
|
West
Indian |
0.0 |
1.3 |
3.6 |
17.3 |
18.7 |
8.3 |
33.2 |
13.3 |
,31.6 |
20.8 |
28.0 |
14.1 |
|
Mean |
0.0 |
0.7 |
1.8 |
12.1 |
22.4 |
10.1 |
28.8 |
8.9 |
31.7 |
24.0 |
28.8 |
30.1 |
|
MEAN |
2.6 |
1.6 |
5.5 |
14.4 |
24.9 |
24.2 |
37.5 |
23.3 |
29.4 |
25.9 |
46.4 |
20.1 |
|
S.E.
for cultivar |
0.66 |
0.50 |
1.21 |
3.01 |
4.29 |
3.40 |
4.35 |
3.84 |
5.94 |
4.15 |
6.36 |
6.19 |
|
S.E.
for rootstock |
0.54 |
0.40 |
0.99 |
2.46 |
3.50 |
2.78 |
3.55 |
3.13 |
4.85 |
3.39 |
5.19 |
4.75 |
|
S.E.
for rootstock within cultivar |
0.93 |
0.70 |
1.72 |
4.26 |
6.07 |
4.82 |
6.16 |
5.43 |
8.40 |
5.87 |
9.0 |
8.75 |
|
TABLE II. Effect of rootstock on cumulative yield,
tree size, fruit weight, percentage of stone, and oil content of fruit of 'Ettinger', 'Fuerte', and 'Hass'
cultivars of avocado. |
|||||
|
Cultivar
/ rootstock |
Cumulative yield per tree (kg/tree) (1979 - 1990) |
Average tree size in 1990 (cm2) |
Average fruit weight (1987 - 1990) |
Average weight of stone % |
Average oil content of fruit % |
|
Ettinger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lula |
260.0 |
202.1 |
298.1 |
22.2 a++ |
13.1 a |
|
West
Indian |
260.3 |
236.7 |
322.8 |
21.3 b |
12.6 b |
|
Mean |
260.2 |
219.4 |
310.5 |
21.7 |
12.8 |
|
Fuerte |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lula |
307.2 |
266.2 |
245.4 |
18.0 a |
11.1 a |
|
West
Indian |
293.1 |
292.5 |
252.1 |
16.6 b |
11.2 a |
|
Mean |
300.1 |
279.3 |
248.7 |
17.3 |
11.2 |
|
Hass |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lula |
208.7 |
267.4 |
221.1 |
16.2 a |
14.0 a |
|
West
Indian |
190.1 |
258.2 |
210.0 |
15.3 b |
14.0 a |
|
Mean |
199.4 |
262.8 |
215.5 |
15.7 |
14.0 |
|
MEAN |
253.2 |
253.8 |
258.2 |
18.3 |
12.7 |
|
S.E.
for cultivar |
15.83 |
12.96 |
6.36 |
0.07 |
0.07 |
|
S.E.
for rootstock |
12.92 |
10.59 |
5.17 |
0.06 |
0.59 |
|
S.E.
for rootstock within cultivar |
23.38 |
18.34 |
8.96 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
|
+ Relative tree size indicated by area of cross
section of trunk 15cm above bud union. ++
Means within the same column followed by the same letter for each cultivar do
not differ significantly at P=0.05 according to the |
|||||