South African
Avocado Growers’ Association Yearbook 1987. 10:94-96
Phytophthora
control in
Australia
KG PEGG1 and AW WHILEY2
1Department of Primary Industries, Meiers Road,
Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia
2Department of Primary Industries, PO Box 5083,
Sunshine Coast Mail Centre, Nambour,
Queensland 4560, Australia
SYNOPSIS
Control of Phytophthora root
rot is based on several cultural procedures including clean nursery stock,
improved drainage and an intensive cover cropping and mulching system.
Fungicide applications are integrated with these cultural treatments.
Phosphorous acid trunk injections have proved to be successful and registration
of this chemical has been achieved in Queensland.
INTRODUCTION
Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands is widely distributed in Australia
(Newhook & Podger, 1972) and very destructive in many of the indigenous
communities (Brown, 1975; Weste, 1974; Shea, 1975). It causes its greatest
devastation in the jarrah forests (Eucalyptus
marginata Donn ex Sm) of south-western Western Australia, where it not only
destroys jarrah, but also most of the plants which form the shrub and
understorey layers of the forest. It is also a devastating pathogen in
Australia in horticultural crops such as avocado and pineapple (Allen et al, 1980).
Although avocados are grown in all mainland Australian states, the major
producing areas are in eastern Australia. In northern New South Wales and the
elevated plateau areas of Queensland (Tamborine Mountain, Blackall Range and
Atherton Tableland) they are grown on deep red basaltic soils which previously
carried dense tropical or subtropical rain-forest, or wet sclerophyll forest.
In coastal south-east Queensland, the Murray Valley, the Riverland district of
South Australia and in the south-west of Western Australia, relatively
free-draining sandy soils are utilised for avocado production. P. cinnamomi is present in most areas,
and root rot is the disease most feared by Australian avocado growers. A number
of strategies are employed by these growers to lessen the impact of this most
destructive pathogen.
CULTURAL ASPECTS OF CONTROL
A number of cultural techniques are employed to reduce the severity of
root rot.
The exclusion of P. cinnamomi by planting
clean nursery stock into clean areas, is considered to be the most important
short-term control measure which can be taken. An Avocado Nursery Voluntary
Accreditation Scheme (ANVAS), which is administered by the Australian Avocado
Growers' Federation (AAGF) with technical assistance provided by State
Departments of Agriculture, has been operating successfully since 1978. This
scheme ensures that the buyer of nursery stock receives plants free of P. cinnamomi, thus reducing the risk of
introducing the fungus into new areas. Even in areas where the fungus is
already present, the planting of clean nursery stock makes Phytophthora management much easier and more likely to be
successful in the long term.
As in other countries where P.
cinnamomi is present, careful site selection to avoid areas of impeded
drainage is fundamental to success. In Australian orchards the soil is often
ridged in the tree rows to improve drainage and thus lessen disease.
Companion cropping
Companion cropping with bananas is used to reduce root rot in the Coffs
Harbour district of New South Wales. These crops are planted on heavy textured
soils on steep hillsides. The bananas contribute much organic matter and 'pump
out' out excessive soil moisture following torrential rain. This is an
extremely competitive environment where the avocado trees compete for both
light and space. However, the eventual removal of banana plants to reduce
competition, results in the development of severe Phytophthora decline symptoms in the avocado trees.
In the red basaltic soils which previously supported rain-forest,
growers' use an ecological method to control root rot. An intensive cover
cropping and mulching system is used in an attempt to build up the organic
matter content of orchards to reach those levels found in the surrounding
undisturbed rain-forest (Pegg et al, 1982).
In the rain-forest, the vegetative cover and organic matter help maintain a
self-regulatory system which locks in nutrients to the growth and decay cycle.
When the rain-forest is cleared, the soils are exposed to rainfall and sunlight
and the organic matter content is reduced from 18 per cent to 3-5 per cent
under grass sward.
Before planting avocado trees and also while the trees are young,
extensive cover cropping is practised, using forage sorghum or maize and Dolichos lablab in summer, followed by
New Zealand blue lupin (Lupinus
angustifolius L) and oats (Avena sativa L) in winter. When tree canopies touch, mulches with a high ratio of
carbon to nitrogen, eg barley straw or sorghum stubble, are added. The timing
of the application of mulches is important; mulches should be partly decomposed
before the summer rains, otherwise too much soil moisture will be retained.
Broadbent & Baker (1974) demonstrated that soils in these natural
communities, as well as in avocado orchards with intensive cover cropping and
mulching, were suppressive to root rot. If the organic matter content was
depleted in these soils, it was found that it became conducive to root rot
development. Suppression of the pathogen was associated with the humus layer of
the soil profile, which showed intense microbial activity. Microbial factors
operating towards suppression were destroyed when soil was treated at 100°C for
30 minutes, but were not removed by steam-air treatment at 49°C or 60°C for 30
minutes. A diverse population of soil micro-organisms probably work together to
suppress the pathogen.
A good example of the natural suppressive ability of these red basaltic
soils is provided in north Queensland, where Brown (1976) studied 'patch death'
in virgin rain-forest. 'Patch death', which he attributed to P. cinnamomi, was restricted to soils
derived from granite-diorite-granodiorite parent material, where it was often
associated with feral pig wallows. The same vegetation growing in adjacent
areas on red basaltic soils was not affected even though climatic conditions
were the same.
Besides providing a complex microflora and fauna, which affect Phytophthora activity and its ability to
cause disease, cover cropping, and mulching and leaf litter from the tree
itself, also increase soil porosity, as well as the moisture and
nutrient-holding capacity. This provides an ideal environment for feeder root
growth. Although rootstocks used in Australia do not possess genuine
physiological resistance to P. cinnamomi,
many of these have good root replacement ability (eg Velvick Guatemalan
seedlings). These plateau areas also have a cool, humid, high rainfall
environment which is extremely favourable for plant growth. All these factors,
together with biological suppression, are interacting in a very complex way to
suppress root rot.
Provided the fungus has not caused too much damage, trees growing in
rain-forest soils can recover from the effects of Phytophthora root pruning by the addition of organic mulches alone.
Once root rot has had a marked effect on above-ground tree health, organic
matter alone will not produce a significant response in tree health, unless a
fungicide is also used to protect the new roots. The organic matter will then
influence the speed of recovery.
A balanced nutritional programme is used to assist in maintaining health
by increasing the capacity of the tree to regenerate replacement roots where Phytophthora has caused losses.
Particular attention is given to phosphorus, calcium and boron nutrition, which
are particularly important for healthy root growth (Wolstenholme, .1981). The
relationship between calcium and root rot has been investigated by a number of
researchers, of whom several have indicated that a favourable soil calcium
level will reduce Phytophthora root rot in avocado (Snyman & Darvas, 1982;
Lee & Zentmyer, 1982; Falcon et al, 1984).
A high calcium content is one of the characteristics of P. cinnamomi suppressive rain-forest soils in Queensland and New
South Wales (Broadbent & Baker, 1974). In a root rot management trial in
New South Wales (Trochoulias, 1986), it was found that calcium amendments gave
the trees a higher health rating (greener leaves) than those trees which did
not receive calcium. These results justify the high soil calcium (3 000-5 000
mg kg-1) levels which are maintained in Australian
orchards for disease suppression.
Most of the visible symptoms of Phytophthora root rot are associated
with water stress (Sterne et al, 1978;
Whiley et al, 1986) or interference
with mineral uptake and distribution of nutrients in plant tissues. If Phythophthora-affected trees are to
recover quickly, any nutrient deficiency or toxicity induced by the disease
must be corrected. Phytophthora root rot-affected trees in Queensland have been
found to have lower leaf concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur, zinc
and boron than healthy trees (Whiley et
al, 1987). Soil applications of nitrogen, phosphorus and sulphur are
adequate means of increasing leaf concentrations of these nutrients when
applied with effective fungicides. However, it has been found to be much more
difficult to supply zinc and boron to trees during the recovery phase.
Preliminary results (Whiley & Pegg, 1987) suggest that trunk injections of
zinc nitrate will increase leaf concentrations of zinc.
Root damage as a result of Phytophthora
infection can also result in chloride accumulation in leaves (Whiley et al,
1987), particularly if irrigation water is high in chloride or if potassium
chloride is used as a source of potassium. Potassium sulphate is recommended in
preference to potassium chloride as a source of potassium in Phytophthora-infested soil.
CHEMICAL CONTROL
Cultural procedures rarely give complete root rot control and chemicals
may be required to reduce disease severity. In February 1987, phosphorous acid
was registered as a fungicide to be used by the Queensland avocado industry.
Registration is pending in all other states. Phosphorous acid is commercially
available in Australia as a buffered solution (monohydrogen dipotassium
phosphite) to reduce the likelihood of phytotoxicity. The discovery of the
trunk injection technique for root rot control (Darvas et al, 1984) and the registration of this inexpensive chemical,
have added a new dimension to root rot control. For the first time an
economically-proven procedure is available in Australia for the control of root
rot in mature bearing avocado trees.
Phosphorous acid has been evaluated in Australia as a soil drench, a
foliar spray and for use in trunk injections (Pegg et al, 1987). During initial experiments soil drenches and foliar
sprays of phosphorous acid, partially neutralised with potassium hydroxide,
were investigated on Persea indica
seedlings growing in pots in a glasshouse (Table 1).
Both foliar and soil treatments were very effective in controlling
Phytophthora root rot. Phosphorous acid soil drenches were also evaluated in
the field at Tamborine Mountain. These drenches gave only short-term (11 weeks)
feeder root protection in a red basaltic soil which had intense biological
activity due to a high organic matter content. Foliar applications of
phosphorous acid are effective for root rot control, but limited experience has
shown that foliar sprays may cause marginal leaf burn and basal burn on fruit
if residues of copper fungicides, which are used for anthracnose control (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz var
minor Simmonds), are present when the
acid is applied. Furthermore, if applied within seven days of applying
dimethoate for the control of Queensland fruit fly (Dacus tryoni Froggott), it may cause severe leaf
burn and premature abscission. The reduced leaf area in diseased trees will also
not absorb sufficient phosphorous acid for any significant curative effect.
A 20 per cent solution of partially neutralised phosphorous acid
injected into trunks of trees severely affected by Phytophthora root rot, was
found to give rapid remission of disease symptoms (Table 2).
After tree injections, residues of phosphorous acid occur in fruit
(October plus December injection with a 10 per cent solution gave from 33-51 mg
kg-1 fresh weight phosphorous acid in Fuerte fruit at maturity,
while with a 20 per cent solution, a residue from 76-83 mg kg-1
fresh weight of phosphorous acid was found). The Australian registration
authorities have set the maximum residue level for phosphorous acid permitted
to be present in the flesh of the avocado, at 100 mg kg-1 fresh
weight. Injections of phosphorous acid administered as directed give residual
levels below this limit.
Prior to the registration of phosphorous acid, metalaxyl was widely used
for root rot control. When first used, metalaxyl gave significant rehabilitation
of root rot affected trees. However, in field experiments there has been a
dramatic deterioration in tree health following three years of exclusive and
continuous use (Table 3).
Apparently this is due to the accelerated biodegradation of metalaxyl.
At present metalaxyl has a very short half life (seven days) in some sandy
soils used for avocado production in southeast Queensland. Besides this
vulnerability to biodegradation, metalaxyl is so expensive that it cannot be
used economically for root rot control in mature bearing avocado trees.
With the development in nature of a strain of P. cinnamomi with resistance to phosphorous acid (Vegh et al, 1985), anti-resistance strategies
have been suggested to prolong its usage in Australian avocado plantations.
Fortunately, due to its strong curative activity, it is well adapted for use in
integrated control strategies. In the relatively cool, humid and high rainfall
districts where soils previously supported dense rain-forests, phosphorous acid
injections are combined with ecological and biological control procedures. Once
trees are restored to full productivity, ecological and biological techniques
are relied upon to maintain health. With good management this should be
possible for several years. If decline symptoms should reappear, the curative
potential of phosphorous acid can once again be used. In hotter and more
stressful environments where orchards are often planted in poorly structured
soils, the root rot hazard is much greater and a fungicide may be needed every
year. Before trees growing in these soils are injected with phosphorous acid,
it has been suggested that the population of P. cinnamomi be lowered using metalaxyl, which is the most
effective substitute for phosphorous acid in root rot control. It may then be
advisable to continue the use of metalaxyl in alternate years, or every three
years. These strategies will help to overcome the problems of resistance and
accelerated biodegradation, both of which are irreversible processes, and also
help to minimise chemical residue accumulation in fruit.
REFERENCES
1 Allen, RN, Pegg, KG, Forsberg, LI &
Firth, DJ, 1980. Fungicidal control in pineapple and avocado of diseases caused
by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Australian
Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, 20,119-24.
2 Broadbent, P & Baker, KF, 1974. Behaviour
of Phytophthora cinnamomi in soils
suppressive and conducive to root rot. Australian
Journal of Agricultural Research, 25,
121-37.
3 Brown, BN, 1976. Phytophthora cinnamomi associated with patch death in tropical
rainforest in Queensland, Australian
Plant Pathology Society Newsletter, 5, 1-4.
4 Darvas, JM, Toerien, JC & Milne, DL,
1984. Control of avocado root rot by trunk injection with phosetyl-Al. Plant Disease, 68, 691-93.
5 Falcon, MF, Fox, RC & Truijillo, EE,
1984. Interactions of soil pH, nutrients and moisture on Phytophthora root rot
of avocado. Hawaii Institute of Tropical
Agriculture and Human Resources, Journal Series No 2801, 12 pp.
6 Lee, BS & Zentmyer, GA, 1982. Influence
of calcium nitrate and ammonium sulphate on Phytophthora root rot of Persea indica. Phytopathology, 72,
1550-64.
7 Newhook, FJ & Podger, FD, 1972. The role
of Phytophthora cinnamomi in
Australian and New Zealand forests, Annual
Review Phytopathology, 10, 299-326.
8 Pegg, KG, Forsberg, LI & Whiley, AW,
1982. Avocado root rot. Queensland
Agricultural Journal, 108, 162-68.
9 Pegg, KG, Whiley, AW, Saranah, JB &
Glass, RJ, 1985. Control of Phytophthora root rot of avocado with phosphorous
acid. Australasian Plant Pathology, 14,
25-9.
10 Pegg, KG, Whiley, AW, Langdon, PW &
Saranah, JB, 1987. Comparison of phosetyl-Al, phosphorous acid and metalaxyl
for the longterm control of Phytophthora root rot of avocado. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture,
27, in press.
11 Shea, SR, 1975. Environmental factors of the
northern jarrah forest in relation to pathogenicity and survival of Phytophthora cinnamomi. Bulletin Forestry
Department Western Australia, No 85, 83 pp.
12 Snyman, CP & Darvas, JM, 1982. Die
uitwerking van kalsium op wortelvrot by avokado. S Afr Avocado Growers' Assoc Yrb, 5, 80-4.
13 Sterne, RE, Kaufmann, MR.& Zentmyer, GA,
1978. Effect of Phytophthora root rot on water relations of avocado:
interpretation with a water transport model. Phytopathology, 68, 595-602.
14 Trochoulias, T, 1986. Avocado soil management
and fertilisers. 'Beyond the Farm Gate', National Australian Avocado Conference
and Field Day Conference Papers, 52-5.
15 Vegh, I, Leroux, P, Le Berre, A & Lanen,
Catherine, 1985. Detection sur Chamaecyparis
lawsoniana 'Ellwoodii' dune souche de Phytophthora
cinnamomi Rands résistante au phosetyl-Al. PHM-Revue Horticole, 262,19-21.
16 Weste, G, 1974, Phytophthora cinnamomi - The cause of severe disease in certain
native communities in Victoria. Australian
Journal of Botany, 22, 1-8.
17 Whiley, AW, Pegg, KG, Saranah, JB &
Forsberg, LI, 1985. The control of Phytophthora root rot of avocado with
fungicides and the effect of this disease on water relations, yield and ring
neck, Australian Journal of Experimental
Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, 26, 249-53.
18 Whiley, AW, Pegg, KG, Saranah, JB &
Langdon, PW, 1987. Influence of Phytophthora root rot on mineral nutrient
concentrations in avocado leaves. Australian
Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 27, 73-7.
19 Whiley, AW & Pegg, KG, 1987. Leaf mineral
nutrient concentrations and yield of Phytophthora root rot affected trees
treated with phosphite-phosphorus compounds. S Afr Avocado Growers' Assoc Yrb, in press.
20 Wolstenholme, BN, 1981. Root, shoot or fruit? S
Afr Avocado Growers' Assoc Yrb, 4,
27-9.
|
TABLE 1 Control of
Phytophthora root rot of Persea indica seedlings in a glasshouse. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Treatment |
Per cent healthy roots |
Root dry weight (g) |
Shoot dry weight (g) |
Shoot growth (cm) |
|
Dolomite
incorporated (5 t ha-1) |
23,92 |
0 81 |
2,08 |
5,80 |
|
Gypsum
incorporated (5 t ha-1) |
50,00 |
1 08 |
3,28 |
8,50 |
|
Gypsum
incorporated (10 t ha-1) |
30,83 |
087 |
3,05 |
6,70 |
|
Diammonium
phosphate surface application (8 g 4 L pot) |
20,42 |
0 49 |
2,34 |
5,00 |
|
Phosphorous acid
drench (1 g L-1) |
82,92 |
224 |
5,95 |
35,00 |
|
Phosphoric acid
drench (1,2 g L-1) |
11,67 |
035 |
1,64 |
2,70 |
|
Phosetyl-Al
drench (1,5 g ai L-1) |
89,58 |
222 |
5,55 |
44,80 |
|
Phosphorous acid
spray (1 g L-1) |
91,67 |
233 |
5,20 |
42,70 |
|
Phosphoric acid
spray (1,2 g L-1) |
9,58 |
040 |
1,76 |
1,00 |
|
Phosetyl-Al spray
(1,5 g ai L-1) |
78,33 |
1 77 |
4,59 |
38,00 |
|
Untreated control |
19,58 |
0 58 |
1,83 |
3,80 |
|
LSD P = 0,05 |
22,75 |
053 |
1,19 |
8,13 |
|
LSD P = 0,001 |
39,66 |
0 92 |
2,08 |
14,20 |
|
Source: Pegg et al, 1985. |
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE 2 Growth and vigour of
branch terminals of avocado trees treated with various fungicides (values are means from five
trees). |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fungicide treatment |
Total length of summer flush on two branch
terminals (cm) |
Flush rating (0 = no terminal flush; 10 = 100% flush of
terminals) |
|
|
Untreated control |
618,9 |
2,0 |
|
|
Metalaxyl under
canopy |
1155,8 |
3,1 |
|
|
Phosetyl-Al trunk
injection |
911,5 |
3,8 |
|
|
Phosetyl-Al and zinc sulphate 10% trunk injection |
975,0 |
4,4 |
|
|
Phosphorous acid
10% trunk injection |
817,6 |
4,2 |
|
|
Phosphorous acid 10% and zinc |
1133,6 |
5,1 |
|
|
sulphate 10% trunk injection |
|||
|
Phosphorous acid
20% trunk injection |
2146,2 |
7,5 |
|
|
LSD (P = 0,05) |
598,7 |
1,8 |
|
|
LSD (P = 0,01) |
|
|
|
|
Source: Whitey et al, 1987 |
811,4 |
2,4 |
|
|
TABLE 3 Health ratings and
fruit yields in avocado trees (cv Fuerte) treated with various fungicides (values
are means from five trees) |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
Health rating |
|
|
|
|
(0 = healthy; 10 = dead) |
|
|
|
Fungicide treatment |
After 2 years |
After 3 years |
Fruit weight (kg/tree) |
|
Untreated control |
4,1 |
7,2 |
4,3 |
|
Metalaxyl under
canopy area |
2,0 |
4,0 |
12,9 |
|
Phosetyl-Al trunk
injection |
1,5 |
0,6 |
53,7 |
|
Phosetyl-Al and zinc sulphate 10% |
1,4 |
1,6 |
48,8 |
|
trunk injection |
|||
|
Phosphorous acid
10% trunk injection |
1,2 |
0,4 |
55,4 |
|
Phosphorous acid 10% and zinc |
0,6 |
0,2 |
47,9 |
|
sulphate 10% trunk injection |
|||
|
Phosphorous acid
20% trunk injection |
0,2 |
0,4 |
67,5 |
|
LSD (P = 0,05) |
1,7 |
1,7 |
19,8 |
|
LSD (P = 0,01) |
2,3 |
2,4 |
26,8 |