South African
Avocado Growers’ Association Yearbook 1987. 10:99-101
RK HANRAHAN & J PAVIOT
Rhone-Poulenc Inc, PO Box 125, Black Horse
Lane,
Monmouth Junction, New Jersey 08852, USA
Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie, 14-20 rue Pierre
Baizet, BP 9163, 69263 Lyon Cedex 09
SYNOPSIS
Phosetyl-Al has been used for
several years to control tree decline due to Phytophthora cinnamomi. Yield
benefit has been shown by treating apparently healthy trees.
Phosetyl-Al[i] is a
systemic active ingredient used extensively to control downy mildews and root
rots caused by fungi of the genus Phytophthora.
Since 1978, it has been tested in avocados for the control of Phytophthora cinnamomi (Rands), the
causal agent of avocado root rot.
In South Africa, Darvas et al
(4) and Wood et al
(13) showed that young trees required at least a monthly-applied foliar spray
of 300 g/hl of phosetyl-Al. This
proved to be valid in nurseries and groves during the first year of plantation
where conditions are favourable for Phytophthora
cinnamomi development. In the USA, Coffey et al (3) demonstrated the efficacy of a preplant treatment by
drench at 1,5 g/plant, while in Morocco, Vanderveyen et al (12) confirmed that a preplant drench,
or a dip in a bath, containing 3000g/plant of phosetyl-Al may help young trees
to overcome planting stress. Many other trials have been done in bearing
avocados, all concluding that the minimum rate must be 300 g ai/hl
with a treatment interval of two to three months. Nevertheless the speed of
vigour recovery is greatly dependent on the status of trees at the first
application: the more defoliated they are, the longer the time required for
complete recovery. When started at the first signs of defoliation, applications
of phosetyl-Al give visible improvements the following year. When trees are
heavily defoliated, Coffey et al (3) and Wood et al (13) demonstrated the necessity of
cutting-back the trees to stimulate regrowth before treating with phosetyl-Al.
The current recommendation is to apply phosetyl-Al at a minimum dose of 300 g ai/hl with treatment intervals of one month in nurseries, one to two months in groves during the first year, two months in non-bearing trees and two to three months in bearing trees. We recommend a foliar spray as a standard treatment practice as this allows growers to obtain the maximum benefits from the basipetal systemicity of phosetyl-Al.
This paper demonstrates the importance and interest of the downwards
systemicity of phosetyl-Al as a factor for increasing the productivity of
groves.
PHOSETYL-AL: A BASIPETAL
SYSTEMIC FUNGICIDE
Setting up evidence of
systemicity
First evidence comes from grape metabolism studies of phosetyl-Al with p32 ratio-labelled active ingredient (2) After depositing droplets of labelled phosetyl-Al on some leaves of young grape cuttings, it was found that after 11 days, 30 per cent of the applied radio-activity was internal, and the majority of it (80 per cent) was in the form of phosphonate. Another study in grafted grapes, following the same protocol, yielded similar results with 20 per cent of the applied radioactivity being absorbed and 95 per cent of this present in the form of phosphonate after 23 days.
Chemical analyses made by Lutringer et
al (8) confirmed this systemicity of phosphonates. In pot-grown tomatoes,
upper and lower leaves were sprayed with phosetyl-Al. Unsprayed parts and the
soil were protected during the treatment with polyethylene bag which were
removed after the spray had completely dried. The contents of different parts
of the plants were then analysed (the interval between treatment and the
harvest of samples for analysis varied between two hours and two weeks). The results
demonstrated that the product migrates in the form of phosphonates which are
slowly converted into phosphorous acid. When comparing plants treated with phosetyl-Al
with plants treated with phosphorous acid, Lutringer et al also
demonstrated that phosphorous acid was absorbed and disappeared, faster than
phosteyl-Al. The hypothesis they proposed to explain this, was that phosphorous
acid is excreted by roots. Further
studies confirm that phosphonates reach the extremity of roots and that excretion is possible (5,6).
In summary, these studies demonstrate that
phosteyl-Al is systemic in the form of phosphonate which is progressively converted to
phosphorous acid.
The practical interest of these properties
The slow conversion of phosetyl-Al into phosphorous acid reduces
the risk of phytotoxicity,
as it is known that sudden penetration of large amounts of phosphorous acid can cause
cell destruction.
This property also allows the prolonged protection of all parts of the treated plants and is
the basis of the long-term efficiency of phosetyl-Al. Field results from Israel by Barak et al (1), which show that phosphorous acid does not protect citrus fruit from brown
rot as long as phosetyl-Al does, further support this point.
In addition to the long-term efficacy, another important characteristic of
phosetyl-Al is its basipetal systemicity. The translocation of active ingredient from leaves to the root
system takes place regardless of root depth or distance from the point of application. This
natural distribution of phosetyl-Al by internal means to the soil, provides protection within any
part of the plant where Phytophihora cinnamomi can develop, even in the very new rootlets. No other soil treatment
can achieve such
an efficient localisation of a product.
This distribution to the extremities of the plant provides
further advantages in the terms of the dynamics of microbial population in the
soil:
· only micro-organisms in
the immediate
neighbourhood of roots, or in contact with them can be affected by treatment. This
reduces the risk of disturbing
non-target microorganisms, some of which are competitors for P. cinnamomi. This may also avoid the
occurrence of a secondary problem related with the suppression of the inhibition of possible other pathogens by beneficial micro-organisms.
· as far as P. cinnamomi is concerned, the same situation occurs: only individuals attacking
roots can be affected by the product. Should a product-tolerant subpopulation occur, it would be in
competition with 'wild type' subpopulation suffering a permanent
situation of numeral inferiority. Such a situation would contribute to reduce the risk of development of such a strain (7), (10), (11).
Therefore, the use of phosetyl-Al as a foliar spray, is the
best way of keeping the root system permanently free of P. cinnamomi, without affecting the natural balance of other
soil mircoorganisms.
The yield benefits obtainable with a treatment programme of
phosetyl-Al is demonstrated by the following results.
Field trials were initiated on the tree variety Miguel,
rootstock Walden, The trees were young enough so as to be clearly separated from
their neighbours. All trees had a similar vigour at the beginning of the trial and were free of symptoms of decline due
to P. cinnamomi. Experimental design was
completely
randomised with 10 to 12 replications, except for one trial where only four replicates
were used. In all cases, plots consisted of one tree per plot and each plot was separated from its neighbours with one
buffer tree. Treatments were made every two months using rates of 240 and 480
g/hl of phosetyl-Al in a spray volume sufficient to allow thorough coverage of leaves. The product was applied with a single nozzle power sprayer. The formulation used was the 80 per cent ai wettable powder named Aliette.
Two types of observations were made:
· measurement of growth of
laterals marked
at the beginning of the year. For this measurement, only the growth over the current
year was taken
into account.
· harvest of each tree and
measurement
of yield (expressed in weight of fruit) and calibration. The latter was carried out on samples
of 20 fruit per tree either by weighing each fruit or by measuring their volume in a water-filled graduated
glass.
Results
Growth measurements are presented in Table 1. The
differences become noticable during the second year of treatment where the
advantage of phosetyl-Al treatment reaches a level of 20 per cent over non-treatment. The difference is higher in
situations where disease pressure is more severe.
In three trials in the USA, yield increase was in the
order of 12 per cent where P. cinnamomi infestation was moderate and reached several hundred per cent in other situations (see Table 2)
under high disease pressure.
Calibration measurements, presented in Table 3, show an
important improvement
of fruit calibration. This improvement accounts for only a part of the total yield
increase. The other part is
related to the increase in fruit numbers.
Similar results have been reported by
Coffey et al in California (3).
Until recently, the efficacy of fungicides against P.
cinnamomi in avocados was assessed by the vigour and mortality of trees which were
selected for exhibiting visual decline symptoms. Trees without apparent symptoms were
considered to be healthy and able to achieve their full yield potential.
Trials were initiated in trees which displayed no external
symptoms of disease, assuming
that hidden root rots might reduce growth
and production before inducing tree
decline. In all tests, a yield increase of at least 12 per cent was obtained. This means that nonvisible development of P. cinnamomi
in trees is possible and reduces production for a long time before decline symptoms are apparent.
Applications of phosetyl-Al on apparently healthy trees in
groves where Phytophthora root rot is
present, therefore provides an extra
benefit of yield increase. This justifies, in many situations, the treatment
not only of trees with visible symptoms but of all trees in the grove. Furthermore, the specific basipetal systemicity of phosetyl-Al ensures that, where treatment programmes of groves are adopted, there are no adverse effects on the natural balance of soil micro-organisms.
|
TABLE 1 Influence of bi-monthly sprays of phosetyl-Al on twig growth. |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Active ingredient |
Dose g/hl |
CHILE* Twig growth in cm |
USA |
|||||
|
Lateral growth in cm |
||||||||
|
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
|||||||
|
T+ |
T+ |
T+ |
Year |
Year |
Year |
Year |
||
|
180 |
450 |
720 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
||
|
Untreated |
|
27 |
28 |
8 a |
23 |
8 |
6 |
9 |
|
phosetyl-Al |
240 |
|
|
|
23 |
10 |
|
|
|
phosetyl-Al |
320 |
29 |
29 |
40 a |
|
|
|
|
|
phosetyl-Al |
480 |
|
|
|
22 |
9 |
9 |
20 |
|
*after A. Pinto de Torres (9) |
||||||||
|
TABLE 2 Influence of bi-monthly sprays of
phosetyl-Al on yield (USA). |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Active ingredient |
Dose g/hl |
Yield by tree (5 kg) |
||
|
Test # 1 |
Test # 2 |
Test #3 |
||
|
2 years |
3 years |
2 years |
||
|
Untreated |
|
26 a |
0 |
2 a |
|
phosetyl-Al |
240 |
38 b |
|
|
|
phosetyl-Al |
480 |
35 ab |
12 |
29 b |
|
after M Coffey et al (3) |
||||
|
TABLE 3 Influence of sprays of phosetyl-Al on fruit calibration. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Active ingredient |
Dose g/hl |
AUSTRALIA |
USA |
||
|
Volume of |
Test # 5 |
Test # 4 |
|||
|
1 fruit |
size of a fruit (g) |
diameter |
|||
|
(ml) |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
in cm |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Untreated |
|
195 a |
170 |
460 |
not harvestable |
|
phosetyl-AI |
240 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
phosetyl-AI |
300 |
280 b |
200 |
850 |
|
|
phosetyl-AI |
480 |
|
|
|
9 |
1
Barak, E, Shalmon, Y & Cohen, E,
1984. Postharvest protection of
citrus against brown rot disease (Phytophthora parasitica) by trunk injection of fosetyl-Al or phosphorous acid. British Crop Protection Conference.
2
Bertrand, A, Ducret, J, Debourge, JC & Horriere, D, 1977. Etude des proprietes dune nouvelle famille de fongicides: les
monoethyl-phosphites metalliques. Caracteristiques physico-chimiques et proprietes biologiques. Phytiatrie Phytopharmacie, 26.
3
Coffey, MD, Ohr, HD, Campbell SD & Guillemet, FB. 1984. Chemical control of Phytophthora cinnamomi on avocado rootstock. Plant
Disease, 68, 11.
4
Darvas, JM, Kotzé, JM & Toerien, JC, 1979. Chemical control of
Phytophthora root rot on replanted avocado trees. The Citrus
and Subtropical Fruit Journal, Dec 1979.
5
Decor, JP, 1985. Stratégie d'étude
de nouveaux fongicides systémiques, exemple du
phosethyl-Al. Congrès de Centenaire de la Bouillie Bordelaise. Bordeaux. Sept 1985.
6
Leconte, Florence. 1984.
Introduction à l'étude de la migration du
phosethyl-Al dans la plante, Rapport DEA,
Université de Poitiers. Oct 1984.
7
Levy, Y, Levy, R & Cohen, Y. Build-up of a pathogen subpopulation
resistant to systemic fungicides under various control strategies: a flexible
simulation model. Phytopathology,
73, 1475-1480.
8
Lutringer, M & Cormis, L de,
1985. Absorption, degradation et transport du phoséthyl-Al et de son metabolite
dans la plante. Agronomie, 5, 5.
9
Pinto de Torres, A & Romero
Saez, L, 1986. Recuperation de paltos enfermos con "producion
de raicillas" (Phytophthora
cinnamomi Rands) con pulverisaciones de Aliette. Agriculture tecnica (Chile), 46 (3) Julio-Septembre
1986.
10 Skylakakis, G.
Epidemiological factors affecting the rate of selection of biocide resistant plant
pathogenic fungi. Phytopathology, 72, 271 -273.
11 Staub, T & Sozzi,
D, 1983 Recent practical experiences with fungicide resistance. 10th International Congress
of Plant Protection. Brighton.
12 Vanderveyen, A, Farih, A, Serrhini, MN & Jonart,
M. Protection de jeunes plantations d'avocatiers en terrain naturellement
infesté par Phytophthora cinnamomi, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique Rabat Maroc.
13
Wood, R & Moll, J, 1981. Result obtained in 1980 from avocado root
rot field trials. S Afr Avocado Growers' Assoc Yrb, Vol 4.