South African Avocado Growers’ Association Yearbook 1987. 10:113-116
New South Wales
Department of Agriculture, North Coast Agricultural Institute, Wollongbar, NSW 2480 Australia
SYNOPSIS
The Fuerte
avocado is very susceptible to anthracnose disease (C.
gloeosprioides var minor) when grown along the east coast of Australia. This
disease caused both field and post-harvest losses to
growers, retailers and consumers. In addition to ripe-rots, lesions also appear
in immature, unripe fruit up to three months before harvest and these fruit are
generally shed. Losses of 71 per cent of
pre-harvest fruit have been recorded. Spore trap studies show that the disease
spreads from dead leaves caught in the canopy and the accumulations of this inoculum leads to higher losses in older trees. Two types
of lesions occur in immature fruit, one is large
(up to 4 cm diameter) and develops rapidly, resulting in fruit fall within 5 to
10 days. Another is small
(0,1-0,5 cm) and occurs in groups over undamaged skin and lenticels. The larger
lesions were associated with skin injuries (insect or mechanical) and were
easily reproduced artificially. A mechanism for these wound infections of
unripe fruit is proposed. The mode of infection of the smaller lesions in
apparently undamaged fruit remains unclear. Control of anthracnose disease in cv Fuerte relies on orchard
management to prevent long periods of fruit
surface wetness. This involves frequent pruning to remove dead leaves and
twigs, removal of short-term windbreaks, timely applications of fungicides to
achieve best possible coverage and control of insect
pests such as fruit sucking bugs and caterpillars.
INTRODUCTION
The three main cultivars of avocado grown along the east
coast of Australia are Fuerte, Sharwil and Hass. Anthracnose disease (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz var minor Simonds) DAR 37820+
can
infect all
three,
although Fuerte is the most susceptible. Fuerte flowers during
the drier months (August to October), carries its fruit through the wet summer months (January to March) and is harvested from April onwards.
Anthracnose disease is predominantly a ripe-rot problem; infections
remain latent (Binyamini & Schiffman-Nadel, 1972) possibly because of the presence of an antifungal diene in
unripe fruit (Prusky et al, 1982). However, lesions also develop in immature,
unripe fruit still on the tree. Fruit can display symptoms from up to three months
before harvest and these fruit generally fall. Fruit abscission is caused by premature ripening resulting
from fungal infection, This phase of the disease is known locally as pre-harvest
anthracnose fruit drop. This is distinct from natural fruit shedding which occurs one to
two months
after set or during extremely dry conditions. Growers apply orchard fungicide sprays in an attempt to prevent both the
pre-harvest fruit-drop phase and the
latent ripe-rot phase of anthracnose
disease. These sprays are applied in
addition to post-harvest fungicide
treatments applied before packaging.
Little work has been published on the epidemiology of
anthracnose disease to aid control in the orchard. Peterson (1978) found that fruit infections were related to rainfall
incidence and could occur from fruit-set until harvest.
Peterson
& Inch (1980) reported that immature fruit lesions developed around injuries to fruit and claimed that damage from insect pests such as Queensland fruit fly (Dacus tryoni Froggatt) and fruit spotting
bug (Amblypelta nitida Stal) could break the latency of dormant infections.
Work reported on in this paper consists of field studies
aimed at identifying sources of disease inoculum, orchard conditions which favour disease, types of immature fruit
lesions, their mode of infection and chemical control.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Field work was done at Alstonville, New South Wales (29°S, 153°E, mean annual rainfall 1 650
mm with a 65 per cent incidence from November to April) using 4 to 14-year-old cv Fuerte
trees.
Inoculum sources
Spore traps similar to those reported by Fitzell & Peak
(1984) were used to trap water-borne conidia and air-borne ascospores (Glomerella cingulata Stonem) from different sites within the tree canopy. Traps were
positioned within trees in February and removed in April, 1981.
Orchard survey
Six Fuerte orchards were surveyed for the incidence of
immature fruit infection. The age, canopy density, copper fungicide spraying history
and the current season's spray schedule were recorded. One hundred and fifty fruit from 15 randomly selected
trees in each orchard were tagged in the first week of March, 1981. Fruits were inspected every seven days and
the percentage of tagged fruit which developed anthracnose lesions and/or fell prior to harvest (mid-May, 1981)
was recorded. Fallen fruits were examined and reasons attributing to their abscission also recorded.
Pre-harvest
fruit lesions
Seventeen trees in two adjoining rows of a 14-year-old orchard
were selected on the basis of similar canopy density and crop load. The pedicel of 60 fruit in each tree were tagged in
February, 1986. Each fruit was inspected every seven days until the orchard was harvested (mid-May).
Anthracnose lesions which developed in immature fruit were categorised as follows: Type 1; large (1-4 cm diameter)
lesions generally
developing singularly. Type 2; small (0,1-0,5 cm diameter) lesions occurring in groups.
Records were made of
percentage
infected fruit having Type 1 or 2 lesions, percentage of fruit drop
attributed to both lesion types and the time interval between lesion development and
fruit drop.
Artificial
inoculation studies
Two hundred symptom-free fruit were tagged in one 11
-year-old Fuerte tree in March, 1983. One hundred fruit were artificially inoculated
in situ by spraying one side with a solution of 10 x 104 conidia mf-t collected by washing the sporulating surface of fruit lesions, or from that of pure cultures (potato dextrose agar) of C.
gloeosporioides var minor. A moist piece of tissue paper was immediately placed over the sprayed area. Half of the fruit was wounded prior to inoculation. The skin of wounded
fruit was punctured to a depth of 3 mm
using a 0,25 mm entomology pin. Wounds
were designed to artificially
represent damage which results from
activity of either Queensland fruit
fly, or fruit-spotting bug. Treated
and untreated control fruit were then
enclosed in plastic polyethylene bags for two days. An
attached branchlet, having three leaves, was also enclosed
in each bag to generate high humidity
and prevent conidia from dessicating. Fruit were inspected daily and records made of the percentage which developed lesions and the time taken to develop them. Fruit which remained free of symptoms on the tree, were harvested 40 days later and monitored for incidence of anthracnose riperot.
Effect of insect injury on latent infections
During March, 1984 and 1985, a plastic rain shelter
(similar to that described by Fitzell & Peak, 1984) was built over one
12-year-old Fuerte tree. The shelter kept fruit completely dry after set and thus prevented natural
field infections during the study. One side of 15 fruit were artificially inoculated with conidia from pure
cultures, on dates shown in Tables 5 and 6. Artificial inoculations were performed from one
to 50 days prior
to having live fruit-spotting bugs or Queensland fruit flies caged around them. Insects were
removed after three or more wound sites were visible inside the inoculated area on
each fruit. Fruit were monitored for development of anthracnose lesions and those remaining after 40 days,
were harvested and checked for incidence of ripe-rot.
Pesticide management programme
to control anthracnose
An orchard spray trial was conducted during the 1984 season
in a 12-year-old orchard, Treatments were (1)
unsprayed
control, (2) prochloraz (0,65 g ai f-t) applied strategically (after wet periods lasting two days) from October to December then copper oxychloride (2 g ai f-t) monthly from January
to April, (3) copper oxychloride (2 g ai f-t) monthly from October to April, (4) fenthion (0,04 per cent) mixed with endosulfan (0,05 per cent) applied twice per month from November to April, (5) treatments (2) plus (4), (6) treatments (3) plus (4). Trees were sprayed with a radial flow, as fan applying 10[ spray per tree. Treatments were replicated six times using single tree plots. Two hundred fruit were tagged in each tree in February. Trees were harvested in mid-May and the percentage tagged fruit remaining was recorded at harvest.
Inoculum sources
Results in Table 1 show that the majority of conidia of C. gloeosporioides var minor came
from dead leaves entangled in the
tree canopy and from infected fruit
which had not fallen. Few conidia were
trapped in water splash from dead
twigs or bark. No air-borne ascospores
of G. cingulata were detected in a volumetric air sampling trap operating over leaf litter.
|
TABLE 1 Average number of conidia caught per water trap after wet periods of greater than 10 mm
rainfall. |
|
|
|
|
|
Source of disease |
Conidia caught x 106 |
|
Dead leaves |
2,18 |
|
Infected fruit (still hanging) |
2,07 |
|
Fruit mummies |
0,77 |
|
Dead twigs |
0,08 |
|
Branch/trunk bark |
Nil |
|
Green leaves |
Nil |
Anthracnose infections were considered to be
responsible for 92 per cent of tagged fruit abscission in the six orchards from March
until May. Stemend rot (Dothiorella aromatica (Sacc) Petr (Syd)) and damage by monolepta beetle (Monolepta australis Jacoby), fruit-spotting bug, Queensland fruit fly and hairy caterpillar (Olene mendose Huber) was judged to be
solely responsible
for 8 per cent of total fruit drop. More immature fruit infections were recorded in
unsprayed orchards containing older trees with dense canopies (Table 2) than in orchards having younger trees.
Regular spraying with copper fungicides reduced the
incidence of anthracnose in immature fruit, particularly where the programme had been applied over previous
seasons.
|
TABLE 2 Survey of immature fruit infection in Fuerte orchards near Alstonville, New South Wales. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous |
Sprays |
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
years |
applied |
of tagged |
|
Orchard |
Age |
Canopy |
orchard |
1980/81 |
fruit |
|
Number |
(yrs) |
Condition |
sprayed |
season |
infected |
|
1 |
8 |
++(+) |
0 |
0 |
58 |
|
2 |
9 |
++(+) |
1 |
6 |
34 |
|
3 |
5 |
+++ |
2 |
9 |
7 |
|
4 |
4 |
+ |
0 |
1 |
16 |
|
5 |
5 |
+ |
0 |
1 |
13 |
|
6 |
6 |
+ |
1 |
8 |
8 |
|
+ foliage not touching within or between rows |
|||||
|
+++ canopy completely closed over |
|||||
Immature
fruit lesions
Table 3 shows the percentage of fruit within a close group of
trees having Type 1 or 2 lesions.
Both lesion types were present in similar numbers. The
majority of fruit which developed Type 1 lesions fell in 8,3 days compared to less than half those with Type 2
lesions which took much longer to drop. Injury to skin, either insect or
mechanical, was found in 91,8 per cent of Type 1 lesions but in only 6,2 per cent of
Type 2. Sixty four per cent
of Type 2 lesions was associated with raised lenticels on the skin, but it was not
possible to detect if these had been injured prior to infections.
|
TABLE 3 Characteristics of anthracnose lesions in immature Fuerte fruit |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Infected |
Average |
% Lesions |
% Lesions |
|
|
|
fruit which |
time to |
associated |
associated |
|
Lesion |
% Fruit |
fell before |
drop |
with skin |
with |
|
Type |
infected |
harvest |
(days) |
injury |
lenticels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
47,4 |
89,7 |
8,3 |
91,8 |
N D+ |
|
2 |
52,5 |
36,5 |
15,6 |
6,2 |
69,3 |
|
+ No data, unable to detect due to skin breakdown around lesion. |
|||||
Artificial
inoculations and effects of insect damage on latent
infections All fruit wounded at the time of artificial inoculation developed anthracnose within five days (Table
4). Uninoculated wounded fruit also developed anthracnose lesions, presumably as a result of field infections of the wound
site. Disease symptoms did not develop in immature fruit which were not wounded prior to
inoculations. Conidia collected from diseased fruit were more successful in establishing
latent infections than those from pure culture.
The effect of damage by fruitspotting bug on latent infections is presented in
Table 5. The number of stylet feeding sites and the resulting severity of skin
damage varied between fruit. Severe damage (30 or more stings) resulted in some fruit drop. However, anthracnose lesions did not develop around damage occurring in the inoculated area. Post-harvest anthracnose ripe-rot developed in all but one inoculated fruit, thus confirming the presence of established latent
infections at the time insects were
feeding.
The effect of Queensland fruit fly damage on latent
infections is shown in Table 6. Damage by this insect was less severe to the skin
of fruit and similarly, damage did not break the latency of artificial infection.
|
TABLE 4 Disease levels in
immature and
ripe fruit after inoculation in the orchard |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inoculation Treatment |
% Fruit diseased on the tree |
Days to first lesion in
unripe
fruit |
% Healthy fruit remaining which developed disease
when ripe |
|||
|
1. Inoculated/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wounded |
100* |
100** |
4* |
5** |
|
|
|
2. Inoculated/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unwounded |
0 |
0 |
|
|
100 |
31 |
|
3. Uninoculated/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wounded |
87 |
34 |
10 |
8 |
|
14 |
|
4. Uninoculated/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unwounded |
0 |
0 |
|
|
48 |
39 |
|
*Exp 1 Conidia washed from infected fruit. |
||||||
|
**Exp 2 Conidia from pure culture |
||||||
|
TABLE 5 Effects of damage by fruit-spotting bug on latent fruit infections |
|||||
|
|
|||||