1999. Revista Chapingo Serie
Horticultura 5: 25-28.
THE POSSIBLE USE OF AVOCADO (Persea
A. Ben-Ya¢acov1; M. Zilberstaine2
1Granot
Avocado Research Unit,
2Extension
Service, Ministry of Agriculture,
Avocado gene pool plots,
established in Mexico (CICTAMEX) and
Key Words: Genetic resources, evaluation, gene
pool.
Avocado is very sensitive
to many soil stress factors, (Ben-Ya’acov and Michelson, 1995) among which salinity, lime,
exchangeable sodium, non-aerated
soil, root-rot and
dryness, each one by itself or in combination with others, limits the planting
possibilities and cause damage and degeneration in existing orchards.
Rootstock selection is one
of the best means of action when soil problems must be solved. But all around
the avocado industries, there were only very few selection projects, and they
were aimed only to solve a specific problem, like the root-rot
problem in
The Californian
investigators found that local seedling rootstock populations, although varying
in many characteristics, showed similar sensitivity to root-rot, and
they decided to enlarge the genetic spectrum by exploring the countries of
origin, collecting diverse material and examining its tolerance to the disease
(Zemtmyer and Schieber, 1987). The wild material of
many species is in a rapid degradation process all around the countries of
origin and this is also the case with the avocado and its botanical relatives.
Hence, conservation of this material has become an urgent task itself, and not
only in order to solve one problem. For this reason we commenced a germplasm
collection and conservation project, through a cooperation between Israel,
Germany, Mexico and people all around the countries of origin in Central and
South America (Ben-Ya¢acov et al., 1992a). Once the collected
accessions were grafted and planted in gene pools, the time came for local
investigators to study their characteristics in general, and their ability to
serve as rootstocks for commercial cultivars. The aim is to find out if some of
the items may have better adaptability to soil stress factors than regular
rootstocks, due to their wider genetical spectrum of
traits. Preliminary report was published on 1992 (Ben-Ya¢acov et al., 1992b).
Fifty four germplasm
accessions were propagated clonally and received VC (Vegetative Clone) numbers,
like other clonal rootstocks. The resulting rooted saplings were planted in
experimental plots, under different soil stress conditions. This procedure was
repeated a few times, mostly without grafting the rootstocks to a cultivar.
Randomized replicates were planted in each plot.
The different experimental
plots and their local conditions were:
1. Givat
Haim: A. This orchard is in the central
part of
B. Another plot was planted at Givat Haim a few years later. The items were grafted here with
the Reed cultivar. Five germplasm items were included, among 10 clonal
rootstock. All of them were pre-selected
for root-rot. As
all the trees did no¢t show
stress symptoms, only their size was graded, on the scale of 1 (small) - 5
(large).
2. Neve-Ya¢ar: Neve-Ya¢ar is an experimental station in the
3. Maoz-Haim: The dry and warm climate in the
4. Emek-Hefer regional orchard: This
site was chose as one half of it was a swamp, and the other one-sandy
aerated soil. The germplasm items were equally represented in both halves.
5. Bet-Dagan: At the
experimental orchard of the
6. Gilat: Another experimental orchard of the Agricultural
Research Organization, at the center of the
7. Ha¢maapil: Under
saline conditions and poorly aerated soil, eight items were planted.
Givat-Haim:
A.
During the
first 3 years after planting most of the germplasm items planted at this
infected orchard had degenerated and died. The best groups of trees were of the
VC 256, and then VC 207 (Day), VC 218 (Antigua), VC 225 (Galvan), all of them
West-Indian
type, and VC 239 (Gainesville, Mexican type) and VC 241 (Persea nubigena 1/7, Guatemalan type).
More
details about this experiment were published (Zilberstaine et al., 1992) and will be given by Dr.
B.
The
results of this experiment are presented in Table 1. From Table 1 it can be
seen that the clonal rootstocks that showed best during the first selection,
i.e. VC 207 and VC 256 are also the best when grafted by the Reed cultivar.
|
Table 1. Evaluation of avocado tree size, Reed cultivar
grafted on different germplasm resistant rootstocks. |
|||
|
Clonal
rootstock |
No. of
trees |
Tree
size in grades |
|
|
Name |
VC No. |
||
|
Day PIC 9615 Galvan (not
identified) |
207 210 225 256 |
8 8 8 7 |
4.8 2.8 4.5 5.0 |
|
Tree size grades - 1 (small) - 5
(large). Survey date - January 1997, at Givat-Haim. |
|||
Neve-Ya¢ar:
Although
growing conditions here were not very poor, some germplasm items suffered and
were lost. After the dryness period of two summer periods, few items were found
to be healthy and vigorous: VC 247 (‘Stuart’, Mexican cultivar), VC 227 (
As a
result of the dryness, Maskaria 2, Apakia, Avocatoza 2 and ²No Race² - were
lost.
Maoz-Haim:
Under
these stress conditions, a few types out of 22, were better: VC 213 (P.
|
Table 2. Avocado tree response to water stress, |
|||
|
Name of
Accession |
Number of Trees
|
Foilage Percentage (100% =
full cover) |
Leaf Burn 0-9 (9 =
totally burned) |
|
Day |
3 |
100 |
0 |
|
PIC 9615 |
2 |
95 |
0.5 |
|
Mayo 133 |
2 |
100 |
2 |
|
Orizaba 1 |
1 |
80 |
0 |
|
Orizaba 4 |
2 |
60 |
0 |
|
Km 145 |
4 |
80 |
6 (2 trees died) |
|
|
5 |
20 |
0 |
|
Comitam 1 |
5 |
15 |
0 |
|
Guzman |
2 |
30 |
3 |
|
Amatenango |
2 |
30 |
0 |
|
Galvan |
2 |
25 |
0 |
|
Orizaba 3 |
2 |
15 |
0 |
|
Maskaria 1 |
2 |
10 |
0 |
|
Stuart |
6 |
30 |
4 |
|
Sholola |
2 |
35 |
5 |
|
P. nubigena 1/7 |
2 |
60 |
5 |
|
P. nubigena 1/8 |
2 |
35 |
5 |
|
Apakia 2 |
2 |
|
died |
Emek-Hefer:
No
difference was found between the two compared parts of the orchard, where
either swamp or sandy soils were prevalent. The best in terms of development
were the following types: VC 207 (Day), VC 225 (Galvan), VC 235 (
Bet-Dagan:
Under very
light sandy soil conditions, many trees did not survive. Out of 20 germplasm
types, the following showed good development: VC 202 (Avocatosa
2), VC 207 (Day), VC 218 (
This order
of priority was changed after a long period of water elimination. The situation
now is presented in Table 2. We found only a few rootstock types that did not
suffer from total leaf drop and from leaf burns: VC 207 (Day), VC 210 (PIC
9615), and the
Gilat:
Under
Ha¢maapil:
Under
saline conditions and poorly aerated soil, one Mexican type was particularly
good. We were convinced that its identification was mistaken, so it received VC
257 number (a new one).
From Table 3 it is clear
that, when planted as rooted trees, different types differ in their behavior
under different ecological conditions. Of course, this result was expected.
Table 3 includes 24 accessions out of 54 that were planted in the experimental
plots (the other 30 showed poor performance in all these plots). Moreover, as
can be seen in the table, even those rootstocks included were not represented
in each plot. From the different types distributed in most of the plots, some
more universal in their adaptation, such as ‘Day’ and Orizaba
3, while some such as ‘Sholola’ or ‘Stuart’, were
adapted to one site only.
Of special importance, the following should
be mentioned: The four accessions that
developed well under root-rot infection (even after they were grafted); the Mexican type ‘Stuart’,
has shown no symptoms of salinity or lime-induced chlorosis under Negev conditions;
the Mexican type Mayo 133, that managed well on alkaline soil; the Mexican non-identified VC 257 (mentioned in the text),
that developed better than all other types under a combination of salinity and
poor aeration (usually Mexicans are sensitive to salinity and West Indians to
poor aeration).
|
Table 3. The best
developed avocado trees from germplasm rooted clones in different orchards. |
|||||||
|
VC No. |
Name |
Givat Haim |
Neve Ya¢ar |
Maoz Haim |
Emek Hefer |
Bet Dagan |
Gilat |
|
202 |
Avocasta 2 |
- |
- |
x |
X |
+ |
- |
|
204 |
Guzman |
+ |
- |
x |
- |
- |
X |
|
207 |
Day |
++ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
209 |
Mayo
133 |
- |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
X |
|
210 |
PIC
9615 |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
+ |
|
213 |
P.
americana C2 |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
|
214 |
Dade |
+ |
- |
X |
X |
||