1999. Revista Chapingo
Serie Horticultura 5: 29-34.
INTRODUCTION
The international avocado (Persea
americana Mill.) industry is based upon relatively few cultivars when
compared with other tree fruit industries. This suggests that only a small part
of the Persea genetic resource has
been developed and that it is even more important to protect and develop wild
germplasm for this crop. Fruit and rootstock breeding programmes contribute to
this process.
lnitial selections in fruit
breeding programmes are usually based on visual traits easily identified in the
field. With rootstock breeding programmes, the process is more complex. Without
reliable phenotypic or physiological markers, it is necessary to use propagated
rootstocks (clonal or seedlings) to screen for dwarfing genotypes. This process
requires an extended evaluation period and is reliant on a long-term commitment
to the maintenance of the original genetic resource in both in situ and ex situ collections. This paper describes some of the strategies
used in dwarfing rootstock programmes and the importance of the different types
of genetic resource to this research.
WHAT IS A DWARFING ROOTSTOCK?
To ease propagation of
fruiting cultivars, scions are often grafted onto seedling or clonal
rootstocks. Some of these scion cultivars may be dwarf types, typically
with small leaves and short internodes. Some of the roots-tocks used can also
affect tree size. These rootstocks are said to be dwarfing. While dwarf scion
cultivars may be useful as dwarfing rootstocks, not all dwarfing rootstocks are
dwarf scion cultivars (Tukey, 1964; Rom and Carlson, 1987).
Dwarfing rootstocks affect
tree vigor, precocity and harvest index (Webster, 1995). They result in a mature
tree that is smaller than when the scion is grown on its own roots or on a
standard rootstock cultivar. In this context reduced vigor may be expressed as
shortened internodes or average shoot length. More usually, however, it is a
result of a shorter growing period or an absence of secondary growth flushes.
Dwarf scion cultivars are
typically slow growing and slow to utilize their allocated orchard space. In contrast,
scion cultivars growing on dwarfing rootstocks are relatively fast growing in
their first years and then with the aid of early fruiting, exhibit slow growth
and reduced vigor (Rom, 1994). Trees with this combination utilize their
allocated orchard space more quickly and achieve maxi-mum harvest index earlier
than the same scion cultivar grafted onto a non-dwarfing rootstock.
ARE DWARFING ROOTSTOCKS NEEDED FOR
AVOCADOS?
Large tree size and
inconsistent fruit yields are major cost drivers for avocado growers in most
countries. Today’s avocado industries are “big tree” industries with relatively
low harvest index. This is especially evident in New Zealand where our free
draining soils and warm humid climate promote strong vegetative growth. At the
previous World Avocado Congress in Israel, Dr Homsky commented that “we cannot
control avocado tree growth because we do not produce 30 t’ha-1 “.
Dwafing rootstocks would be a major tool for avocado growers to achieve these
increased yields and improved harvest index.
In the apple industry,
maximum tree height for optimum fruit yields is 4m if a gap of 2m is left between
the canopies (Rom, 1994). However, this depends on tree shape and row orientation
(Palmer, 1989). Typically mature tree height for avocados in New Zealand is 8
to 10 m. A combination of dwarfing rootstocks and innovative pruning systems
(e.g. Stassen et al., 1998) would
enable avocado trees to be grown to 4m in height or less. Trees of this
stature, in high density planting systems have the potential to at least double
fruit yields per hectare and cut harvesting costs by two thirds. One can see
evidence of this in California with the high-density plantings of ‘Reed’ (R.
Hofshi, pers. comm.), and in Chile with the cultivar ‘Bacon’ (Razeto et al., 1998). These examples are with
compact, upright growing cultivars with numerous nondominant sylleptic shoots
along their primary growth axis (Thorp and Sedgley, 1993). While fruit breeders
can select for these tree forms, it is more efficient for these programmes to
focus on fruit quality attributes with harvest index as a secondary criterion.
Dwarfing rootstocks would provide an option to increase the harvest index of
all cultivars, even the most vigorous types.
Genetic resources
Fruit tree breeding
programmes depend upon access to wild germplasm. This germplasm may be held in situ in biological reserves and forests
or ex situ in field genebanks,
usually attached to research centers. Both types of conservation are valid and
are generally treated as complementary strategies (Pistorius, 1997). Rootstock
breeding programmes can help ensure greater genetic diversity and longevity for
these collections.
Most of the avocado gene
banks are maintained primarily as sources of fruiting cultivars and thus tend
to be focused on relatively few genotypes with desirable fruit attributes.
These collections often contain few “wild” accessions and collectively
represent just a small part of the genetic diversity (Smith et al., 1992). Rootstock breeding programmes,
however, can expect to have wider interests and thus can perform an important
role in expanding the genetic diversity of collections.
Smith et al (1992) have expertly summarised early efforts to identify and
conserve Persea germplasm. More
recently, the efforts of Dr. Barrientos-Priego and Luis López-López in Mexico,
and Dr. Ben-Ya’acov in Israel, have been extremely important to increasing the
genetic diversity in avocado field genebanks (Barrientos-Priego et al., 1998; López-López et al., 1998). The challenge now is to
continue and expand their efforts.
Dwarfing rootstocks also
provide an economic incentive to work with Persea
genetic resources and help ensure the longevity of collections. Without an
economic incentive, genetic resources tend to become neglected and material
lost (Smith et al., 1992).
STRATEGIES FOR SELECTING DWARFING ROOTSTOCKS
Despite the long history of
rootstock development in a range of fruit industries (e.g. apples, pears, cit
us), there is still little knowledge of how dwarfing rootstocks affect the
growth of scion cultivars (Webster, 1995). Without reliable physiological
explanations, there has also been little progress towards identifying markers
for dwarfing. With avocados this means that every seedling and cultivar is a
potential candidate until it has been screened either as a clonal rootstock or
as an interstock. In practice not all plants can be screened and various
methods can be used to make the process more efficient.
Ecogeographical surveys
With apples, it is likely
that aII of the major dwarfing rootstock cultivars can be traced back to a
relatively narrow genetic base centered around the Caucasian Mountains (Tukey,
1964). Dwarfing apples from the e regions came to be known as “Paradise”
apples. When searching for the avocado equivalent of the “Paradise” apple, it
may be worthwhile to focus on specific regions here wild populations are located
rather than just on taxonomic surveys.
Ben-Ya’acov and Michelson
(1995) have noted differences in dwarfing ability among the three races of avocado.
Seedlings of West Indian types, in particular the Nachlat types identified in
Israel, are more dwarfing than Mexican seedlings, which are more dwarfing than
Guatemalan types. These authors mention that incompatibility of graft and environmental
response may have influenced their results and suggest the work be repeated on
well-aerated soils. They conclude by saying that a search for dwarfing
rootstocks in the Mexican highlands may have a better chance of success. This
option should be considered in ecogeographical surveys.
Dwarfing species
Confining efforts to
relatively few species can also be productive when screening for dwarfing
genotypes. It is essential that this material is held ex sítu in field genebanks to ensure the identity of candidate
clones. Many of the dwarfing rootstocks for citrus belong to the species Poncirus trifo!iata including the
extremely dwarfing ‘Flying Dragon’ rootstock (McCarty and Cole, 1982). This
roots-tock with its ornate twisted growth habit is likely y to have originated
as a mutant of a non-dwarfing genotype (Cheng and Roose, 1995). Possibly the
‘Wilg’ done in South Africa is an avocado equivalent of the ‘Flying Dragon’
(Roe et al., 1998). However, it
should be noted that trees on ‘Flying Dragon’ rootstock are said to be slow growing and
that technically ‘Flying Dragon’ is not a dwarfing rootstock (Rom and Carlson,
1987).
Bergh (1975) has suggested
the following clones and species as possible sources of dwarfing rootstocks:
‘Mt4’, Jalna, ‘Wurtz’, ‘Nowels’, P.
schiedeana, P. floccosa, P. americana var. nubigeana. Systematic evaluation of these would be worthwhile.
Some preliminary screening
work of Persea species has been
completed using root and stem wood anatomy as possible markers for dwarfing genotypes
(Tables 1 and 2). This complements previous work by López-Jiménez and
Barrientos-Priego (1987). Beakbane (1952) referred to a relationship between
the anatomical structure of dwarfing apple rootstocks and the recorded behavior
of scions grafted on them. If a similar and useful relationship can be
demonstrated with avocado then we can use this to develop a rapid screening
method for seedlings before field evaluation of promising types. In our work,
plants from a range of Persea species
were grouped according to density of xylem vessels in stem and root wood; and
the ratio of bark transversal area and stem or root transversal area in roots
and stems. While it remains to be tested if any of these characters are useful
markers for dwarfing genotypes, if consistently applied the process does ensure
that a range of phenotypes is included. For example, it would be our intention
to include individuals representative of a wide range of vessel density
including both extremes.
Many of the “Paradise”
apple clones had a natural tendency to produce adventitious roots and so were
easy to propagate from cuttings (Tukey, 1964). Often it was this character that
first attracted plant selectors. Plants of Persea
steyermarkii and Persea americana are
also known to exhibit this character and thus could be included in a screening
programme for dwarfing rootstocks (Barrientos Priego et al., 1998; Borys, 1991).
New Zealand as a site for ex situ collections
Although wild germplasm may
be well adapted to its native environment, in
situ genebanks can still be at risk. Native environments are not always
conducive to healthy plant growth, especially if the soils are infertile and
have poor drainage, and there are pressures from local pests and diseases (e.g.
Phytophthora cinnamomi and sunblotch
viroid). In these situations, it is useful to establish ex situ genebanks at sites with fertile soils and low pressure from
pest and disease.
The free draining soils and
low salinity conditions in New Zealand promote healthy tree growth and thus
would be ideal for ex situ collections
of Persea germpasm. New Zealand is
also free of sun blotch viroid. Although limited to cold tolerant genotypes,
avocado genebanks established in New Zealand would be a secure source of clean
material for international breeding programmes.
Conditions in New Zealand
that promote rapid plant growth are also ideal for the development of dwarfing
rootstocks. Without the confounding effect of salinity or Phytophthora on
rootstock performance, dwarfing genotypes could be identified in New Zealand
and then provided to overseas rootstock programmes selecting for tolerance to Phytophthora
or salt-laden soils. This type of collaboration would also reduce the chances
of slow growing, potentially dwarfing genotypes being discarded from these programmes.
Once candidate clones have
been identified for inclusion in a dwarfing rootstock programme efficient and effective
screening techniques are needed. This can be achieved using seedling
rootstocks, especially when evaluating populations based on geographical or taxonomic
groupings. Greater consistency would be achieved if all candidate clones were
screened as clonal rootstocks or alternatively as interstocks. Both methods
have been useful with apples (Rom and Carlson, 1987).
|
Table 1. Vessel density and ratio of bark transversal
area (BTA) and stem or root transversal area (TA) of stem and root wood
samples of Persea species held at
the University of California’s South Coast Research and Extension Center.
(Replicated data accompanied by ± 1 s.e.) |
|||||||
|
Samples |
Species |
Clone |
VesselsZ |
|
|
|
BTA
/ TA |
|
|
Stem wood |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.
americana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
‘Hass’ |
29 |
±1.6 |
15.7 |
±1.0 |
|
|
|
|
‘XX3’ |
28 |
±2.1 |
17.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
‘102’ |
16 |
±0.7 |
24.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
‘46-40-22’ |
34 |
±1.8 |
16.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
‘Colin V33’ |
|
|
17.3 |
± 0.7 |
|
|
|
P. floccosa |
|
18 |
±0.8 |
12.5 |
± 1.0 |
|
|
|
P. Iongipes |
|
46 |
±3.4 |
20.5 |
|
|
|
|
P. schiedeana |
|
33 |
±2.8 |
23.1 |
± 0.6 |
|
|
|
P.
steyermarkii |
|
19 |
±1.2 |
17.0 |
± 3.2 |
|
|
|
P.
tolimanensis |
|
28 |
±1.7 |
16.0 |
± 0.8 |
|
|
Root wood
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. americana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
‘46-40-22’ |
30 |
±2.5 |
39.2 |
± 6.3 |
|
|
|
|
‘Toro Canyon’ |
38 |
|||