1999.
Revista Chapingo Serie Horticultura 5: 73-76.
Productivity study of four avocado CULTIVARS
in Algarve Region
Direcção Regional de Agricultura do Algarve
Apartado 282, 8000 – Faro
Portugal
With the purpose to proceed at productivity study of
four avocado cultivars and influence of four rootstocks, Direcção Regional de
Agricultura do Algarve has established at Centro de Experimentação Horto –
Frutícola do Patacão, on May 1983, avocado trials. From several parameters,
which have been registered, some results were
already published. Only data relating to cultivar production were not yet
matter of any writing reference. For
the productivity were selected ‘Hass’, ‘Reed’, ‘Bacon’ and ‘Fuerte’ as scion
cultivars, as well as ‘Topa-Topa’, ‘Lula’, ‘Antilhano of Canárias’ and ‘Duke 7’
as rootstocks. Along fourteen years of observations (1985 – 1998), it was
confirmed a significant effect of cultivar x rootstock interaction on the
production, being in the limelight the ‘Bacon’ x Lula symbiont.
Key
words: Persea americana Mill.,Avocado, cultivar
evaluation, Rootstock.
Our current Decennium has emphasised the option of the fruit consumer,
recognising, in turn, the term "New Fruit-Growing", known also as
"Tropical Fruits". This tendency, when change of nutritious diet is
taken into consideration, will increase accordingly, as long as are known fruit
qualities of this group which reach a superior nutritious level to some
Mediterranean fruits.
Among the agrarian pursuits developed in the Algarve, the fruit tree is
a relevant production. Bearing in mind desire diversification of production,
plus southern Portugal's advantageous conditions, the vocational ambition of
the Algarve farmer is this: conception and understanding, throughout the last
few years, of the ever increasing importance and culture of new species.
The avocado isn't included here, as its introduction to the Algarve is
too recent.
It's absolutely essential to understand the avocado's adaptation to local
conditions as well as its productive ability. As a result, Direcção Regional de
Agricultura do Algarve are putting into effect an experimental work based on
trials established from 1983. Using four previously selected cultivars, the
purpose of the present study is to gain a knowledge of species productivity, as
well as knowledge of the influence of used rootstocks.
The trial started in 1985 from plot 1 of Centro de Experimentação
Horto-Frutícola do Patacão, within the
council of Faro, at an orchard fully grown as of May 1983 - density 313 trees,
spacing of 8 m x 4 m and established on a clay loam soil. The orchard area was
5.900 m2.
‘Hass’, ‘Bacon’, ‘Fuerte’ and ‘Reed’ cultivars were used, grafted on
‘Topa-Topa’, ‘Lula’, ‘Antilhano das Canarias’ and ‘Duke 7’. Grafted plants at
‘Lula’ and ‘Duke 7’ have emanated from, respectively, Blanco Nursery, of
Velez-Malaga (Spain) and Brokaw Nursery, of California (U.S.A).
The remainder were obtained from Centro de Experimentação Agrária de Tavira
(Algarve - Portugal) using ‘Topa-Topa’ seed and four cultivars vegetative
material, then in study, from Estacion Experimental "La Mayora" of
Algarrobo-Costa (Spain). Antilhano seed was acquired from Instituto Canario de
Investigaciones Agrarias, of Tenerife (Spain).
Experimental design was of random blocks, with four repetitions and 32
plants per plot, with two plants of the same combination, cultivar and
rootstock on each plot.
The grafting type in use was cleft-graft.
Irrigation, during the first years, took place through a micro-tube of 3
mm x 1 mm with a 4 liter·h-1 debit. Subsequently the system was
enhanced by self-regulated micro-sprayers with a 70 liter·h-1 debit.
The overall surrounds of the trial were installed with a wind break
fixed at the foot of the avocado trees.
Applied fertilization was based on results of soil and leaf
analysis. At this work yield results
are statistically treated.
According to statistical study (Table 1), on the mean of observation
years (1985 - 1998), there was significant effect (p≤0.005) of cultivar x rootstock interaction on
yield (kg·tree-1).
Attending to the fruit number/tree (Table 2), such interaction was not
significant (p>0.05).
Effects of cultivar or rootstock as independents, were, however, at both
cases, highly significant (p≤0.001).
the Duncan test (Figure 1) confirms that the best combination, in terms of production, was the combination of ‘Lula’ x ‘Bacon’. There were, however, no significant differences when the same cultivar was grafted on remaining rootstocks, likewise ‘Fuerte’ on other rootstocks, with the exception of Antilhano - this otherwise leads average lower productions with ‘Hass’, ‘Fuerte’ and ‘Reed’ cultivars.
Although without significant differences among the number of fruit (p>0.05), highest average
productions were obtained at the cost of higher numbers of fruit.
As Figure 2 shows, the most productive cultivar, independent of
rootstock, was ‘Bacon’. With relation to the fruit number, as ‘Hass’ and ‘Bacon’
cultivars, there aren’t significant differences.
Excluding the influence of cultivar, all rootstocks - when production
(Figure 3) and the number of fruit were taken
into consideration - were superior to Antilhano. Finally when considering the
variable year, yield differences were highly significant (p≤0.001) (Table 1). The most
productive year was 1998 (Figure 4). Results show, however, from 1991 on, the
tendency is for stabilisation of production. Differences were discovered among
average productions - ultimately due to conditions occurring annually, more or
less suitable for the crop.
Following data analysis obtained, some
significant conclusions can be detailed. There is a significant effect with the
interaction of cultivar and
rootstock, ‘Lula’ x ‘Bacon’ the best production example. There are no
significant differences for that on remaining rootstocks, and the cultivar
Fuerte on all rootstocks, with the exception of Antilhano.
The rootstock Antilhano leads average lower productions with ‘Hass’,
‘Fuerte’ and ‘Reed’. Independently of rootstock, ‘Bacon’ was the most
productive cultivar.
The results show that the tendency, since 1991, has been towards a
stabilisation in production.
The author wishes to thank Drª Engª Agrª Maria de Fátima Calouro Alves,
of the Laboratory Químico-Agrícola Rebelo da Silva (INIA), for her assistance
on data statistical treatment. Engº Paulo Oliveira should also be greatly
acknowledged for his contribution to this work.
BEN YA’ACOV, A. 1975-1976. Avocado
rootstock. Scion relationships. A long term, large scale field research
project. Calif. Avocado. Soc. Yearbook.
FERREIRA, E. L. 1993. Ensaio de adaptação e avaliação de porta-enxertos x
variedades de abacateiro. Fruticultura – Experimentação Frutícola no Algarve –
Alguns Aspectos: 13 – 24. DRAALG /
DDI.
STOREY, W.B. 1955. Evaluation of avocado varieties and
rootstocks. University of California, Citrus Experiment Station, Riverside.
|
Table 1. Analysis of variance – Production (kg·tree-1). |
||||
|
Source of variation |
d.f. |
Sum of squares (SQ) |
Mean square |
F-ratio |
|
Replication |
3 |
1,7278E10 |
5,75933E9 |
9,22 *** |
|
Year |
13 |
3,66101E11 |
2,81616E10 |
45,10 *** |
|
Rootstock (R) |
3 |
1,46378E10 |
4,87926E9 |
7,81 *** |
|
Cultivar (V) |
3 |
2,16679E10 |
7,22262E9 |
11,57 *** |
|
Interaction (R ´ V) |
9 |
1,12852E10 |
1,25391E9 |
2,01 * |
|
Residual |
1383 |
8,63643E11 |
6,24471E8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
1414 |
1,29461E12 |
|
|
|
* - p£0,05; *** - p£0,001 |
||||
|
Table 2. Analysis of variance – Production (number
of fruits per tree) |
||||
|
Source of variation |
d.f. |
Sum of squares (SQ) |
Mean square |
F-ratio |
|
Replication |
3 |
96504,7 |
32168,2 |
3,210
** |
|
Year |
13 |
5,72218E6 |
442476,0 |
44,200 *** |
|
Rootstock (R) |
3 |
215915,0 |
71971,6 |
7,190 *** |
|
Cultivar (V) |
3 |
761958,0 |
253986,0 |
25,380 *** |
|
Interaction (R ´ V) |
9 |
147425,0 |
16380,6 |
1,64 n.s. |
|
Residual |
1383 |
1,38418E7 |
10008,5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
1414 |
2,08158E7 |
|
|
|
n.s.
– p>0,05; * - p£0,05; ** - p£0,01; *** - p£0,001 |
||||


Figure 1. Average effects
of cultivar x rootstock interaction on mean yield.

Figure 2. Average effects
of cultivar on production.


Figure 3. Average effects
of rootstock on production.
Figure 4. Average production over the length of 14
years of tests (1985-1998).

