1999. Revista Chapingo Serie Horticultura 5: 251-253.
INTEGRATION OF STRATEGIES FOR CONTROLING ROOT-ROT IN
AVOCADO IN
In cooperation with
Osnat Ben-Gal, Oren Levi and Assa Linn.
1Extension Service, Ministry of Agriculture,
2Granot Avocado Research Unit,
Summary
Planting avocados on
resistant rootstocks is the most effective way to cooperate with Phytophthora cinnamomi
1. Israeli rootstocks with excellent high
yield potential: VC 69; VC 66; VC 55; VC 49; VC 28.
2. Rootstocks from germplasm: VC 256;
VC 241; VC 239; VC 225; VC 218; VC 207.
3. Rootstocks originating from
surviving trees - Givat Chaim plantations: VC 812; VC
811; VC 805; VC 804; VC 803; VC 801.
4. Rootstocks selected for resistance
in
In productive
plantations where the P. cinnamomi infection has been detected, use of a
chemical agent may be effective. Two agents showing equal efficacy are ‘Foli-O-Fos 400’
and ‘Canon 50’ - in
vitro and in vivo (on young
plants) testing.
Introduction
Root rot disease,
caused by the Phytophthora cinnamomi
Preventing the spread
with the use of chemical and/or biological agents is never effective in the
long run. Moreover such an approach, overuse of chemicals, is inconsistent with
a growing world-wide concern for ecology. Therefore,
particular importance is given to the search for rootstocks more resistant to
the disease as the most effective long-term alternative.
Over the course of 16
years¢ research, emphasis has been placed primarily on development
of resistant rootstocks, as well as finding appropriate treatments to
rejuvenate infected mature plantations.
Research Objectives
1. Selection of avocado rootstocks
resistant to the P. cinnamomi pathogen.
2. Horticultural assessment of the
selected rootstocks for resistance.
3. Determining the most effective
strategy for treating avocado plantations infected by P. cinnamomi pathogen,
testing different chemical agents.
Research Management
The research is done in several ways.
1. Selection of resistant avocado
rootstocks obtained from different genetic sources. (A. Ben-Ya¢acov¢s
research provided the basis).
2. Horticultural assessment of
resistant rootstocks done on a number of sites (Kfar Hogla, Givat Chaim Ichud
and Mishmar Ha¢emek).
3. Establishing management policy for
plantations infected with the root rot
disease. This process is implemented primarily through experiments and
monitoring in infected commercial plantations.
Materials and Methods
Selection of resistant rootstocks
When the disease was first identified in
In the selection plot, 4 groups, differentiated by their genetic sources
were examined:
1. Israeli rootstocks which were superb
horticulturally (From Ben-Ya¢acov¢s selections) (about 40 rootstocks).
2. Collection of primitive germplasm
sources from countries in which avocado originated (Collected by Ben-Ya¢acov)
(50 rootstocks).
3. Trees which survived from infected
plantations (25 rootstocks).
4. Rootstocks selected for resistance
in
These selection procedures, under field conditions, continue for 12–16
years.
Horticultural Testing of Resistant Rootstocks
The selected rootstocks have been planted in 3 commercial
plantations. In these grafted trees, the degree of influence on the yield
potential will be tested. The sites on
which these were planted commercially are: Givat Chaim Ichud, Kfar Hogla, and
Mishmar Ha¢emek. In these plantations the horticultural indicators of trunk size, leaf
burn and chlorosis are being closely followed. Yield data will be collected as
soon as the trees reaches the 5th year.
Growth practices aimed at rehabilitating mature
infected plantations
In this research, we tested the efficacy of
1) ‘Foli-R-Fos 400’, manufactured by ²U.I.M.
Agrochemicals² (Aust.) Pty, Ltd. It contains 400
grams per liter of phosphoric acid (H3PO3) pH 5.7 -
6.0.
2) ‘Canon 50’ manufactured by ²
The efficacy of these agents was examined in vitro, on P. cinnamomi
selective media (Kannwischer and Mitchell,1978) and in-vivo, on Degania 117. The
plants underwent, testing both in artificial lab conditions as well as in field
conditions among infected young potted tree plants within the plantation.
Results and Discussion
Selection of resistant rootstocks
What sets this selection apart is the fact that it is based on field
conditions where infection is present. At the end of 12 years of selection
examination (1984 - 1996) 17 resistant rootstocks were
selected and sent on to be checked for horticultural parameters in commercial
plantations. Details as follows:
1. Israeli rootstocks with excellent
fertility rates: VC 69; VC 66; VC 55; VC 49; VC 28.
2. Rootstocks originating from germplasm:
VC 256; VC 241; VC 239; VC 225; VC 218; VC 207.
3. Rootstocks originating from trees
which had survived in Givat Chaim¢s plantation: VC 812; VC 811; VC
805; VC 804; VC 803; VC 801.
These rootstocks are currently being monitored in commercial plantations
throughout
Horticultural Testing of Resistant Rootstocks
All of the rootstocks in the first group (the Israeli rootstocks) have
been proven as high yielding in various regions throughout
Growth practices aimed at rehabilitating mature
infected plantations
It is recognized world wide that agents based on phosphoric
acid (H3PO3) are very effective in treating P. cinnamomi.
These chemical agents counter P. cinnamomi at the tree¢s
feeder root system by simultaneously stimulating growth of new roots while
depressing the fungus¢ activity (Zilberstaine, 1988,
Coffey, 1987). In the past ‘Aliette’, a French product, was in common use (
|
Table 1. The
efficacy of chemical against P. cinnamomi. |
||
|
Chemical concentration. (mg·liter-1) |
P. cinnamomi growth
ratez Diameter (% of control) |
|
|
|
Canon |
F.
J. 400 |
|
0.001 0.005 0.01 -------------------------- 0.05 0.1 0.3 |
78.1 65.6 44.3 ------------------------------ 56.3 33.5 12.2 |
72.2 68.1 39.1 -------------------------- 58.1 48.0 12.3 |
|
zHyphae
growth rate on P. cinnamomi selective media, 48h, 24°C. |
||
In this research, the efficacy of the 2 examined agents – ‘Foli-R-Fos 400’
and ‘Canon 50’, on P. cinnamomi was similar, in vitro experiments (Table 1) as well as in vivo ones (Table 2). In these experiments, both agents were
shown to be effective in hampering the development of the fungus as compared
with the control groups¢ treatments.
|
Table 2. Agents¢ effect
on the incidence of infected roots in avocados with P. cinnamomi. |
|
|
Treatment |
Infected
roots (%) |
|
|
|
|
Control |
73.6
+ 9.5 |
|
F.J.
400 |
0 |
|
Canon
- 50 |
0 |
In the last 15 years,
the practices of injecting tree trunks during vegetative root growth periods
has taken place. (Kaiser et al, 1998). This practice however is quite costly
and is thought to cause damage to the trees¢ vitality if used over a period of
several years. In
Treatment Policy
When one or more trees
are found to be infected within a plantation, several steps should be taken in
order to a) prevent the disease¢s spread within the plantation or to
neighboring plantations, and b) treat infected trees and rejuvenate them,
including treatments to improve soil drainage. Details of these procedures can
be found in ²Protocol of Avocado Growing² under the heading ²Diseases², 1998.
Acknowledgements
Warm thanks to the
staffs who have participated over the years: Lionel and Joel from Givat Chaim
Ichud, Aryeh and Shavit from Mismar Ha¢emek, Dani from Kfar Holga and Nabil
from Adamit plantation. Also to Ehud Yogev of “Luxembourg Industries Ltd.” and
Dvori-Or Nurseries. I wish to thank “Luxembourg Industries Ltd.”
for their support for this research work.
LITERATURE
CITED
Ben-Ya¢acov, A.; Michelson,
E. 1995. Horticultural Reviews. 17: 381-429.
Coffey, M.D. 1987. Plant Disease. 71: 1046-1052.
Growth Protocol - a work manual for avocado growers
(in accordance with ²Acofresh²
principles) (1998). (In Hebrew).
Kaiser, C.:
Whiley, A.W.
1998. Research Report, Queensland Horticulture Institute,
Kannwischer, M. E.; Mitchell, D.J. 1978, Phytopathology 68: 1760 –
1765.
Zilberstaine, M. 1988. Doctoral thesis presented to Hebrew University
Senate,
Zilberstaine, M.; Osnat Ben-Gal, O. 1997. Interim Report presented to
the Fruit Council. (In Hebrew).