1999. Revista Chapingo
Serie Horticultura 5: 297-300.
EFFECTS OF
GREENHOUSE THRIPS (Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis)
LIFE-STAGE, DENSITY AND FEEDING DURATION ON DAMAGE TO AVOCADO FRUIT
P. Stevens;
K. Froud; E. Mills
The Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand
Ltd.
Private Bag 92169,
Phone:
+64-9-8154200 Fax:
+64-9-8154201 E-mail-
pstevens@hort.cri.nz
Greenhouse thrips
(Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis
Bouché) are an important pest of avocados in
INTRODUCTION
Greenhouse thrips
(Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis
Bouché) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) are an important pest of avocados in
Greenhouse thrips
in
Most greenhouse thrips damage to Hass avocados in New Zealand occurs
between January and June when fruit are between two and seven months old
(Stevens, unpublished data). The timing
of insecticide applications necessary to prevent greenhouse thrips
damage to new season’s fruit potentially falls into the period of crop overlap,
when previous season’s fruit are still being harvested. The application of insecticides can therefore
result in a delay in picking of mature fruit due to withholding period
requirements. It would be useful to have
a greenhouse thrips monitoring system that would
allow the accumulation of damage to be predicted over time, to determine the
consequences of delaying sprays if it is important for picking not to be
disrupted.
A potential thrips
monitoring system for avocados in
Phillips (1997)
introduced the concept of “thrips-weeks” to describe
the relationship between thrips density and duration
of feeding on the severity of damage. It
was estimated that 25 thrips-weeks (any combination
of thrips density x number of weeks feeding which
equates to 25) would result in a ¾ inch scar to avocado fruit. The thrips-weeks
concept potentially allows the prediction of damage caused by a particular thrips population density over time.
The damage caused by
larvae versus adult thrips was not distinguished in
the thrips-weeks model. While severe, well-established infestations
consist mainly of larval life-stages, early colonisation
of fruit consists predominantly of adult thrips. This paper describes experiments comparing
the effect of greenhouse thrips life-stage (adults
versus larvae) and the effect of adult thrips density
and duration of feeding on the level of fruit damage.
All trials were carried
out in a mature block of Hass avocado in Whangarei,
Individual avocado fruit were
artificially infested with either 20 1st instar
or 20 adult greenhouse thrips on
Individual fruit were
artificially inoculated with adult thrips using the
methods described in experiment 1.
However, fruit were infested with either 1, 5,
10, or 20 adult thrips. Thrips were left on
the fruit for either 1, 2, or 4 weeks.
Ten replicates of each density/duration combination were set up. This experiment was carried out on mature
fruit (thrips placed out on 9.12.98) and on immature
fruit (thrips placed out on 4.3.99).
Data were analysed
using the statistics package SAS (SAS Institute Inc., 1985). The area of fruit
damaged by larval or adult thrips was compared using
a t-test. The areas of fruit damage resulting from the various thrips density/feeding duration combinations were converted
into thrips-weeks and compared using analysis of
variance. The lines of best fit for
feeding duration versus damage were calculated using linear regression.
Adult thrips
caused significantly more damage than larval thrips
(Table 1). All fruit inoculated with
adult thrips had greater than 2 cm2 damage
and would have been rejected from export grade.
These results suggest that a greenhouse thrips
monitoring system needs to distinguish between the presence of larval and adult
thrips.
The Californian thrips-weeks model for mixed-aged thrips
populations predicts approximately 0.14 cm2 damage per thrips-week. If the
amount of damage for adults and larvae obtained in these experiments is
averaged, an accumulation of 0.13 cm2 damage per thrips-week
would be predicted for a 50:50 adult-larval colony.
|
Table 1.
The area of avocado fruit with greenhouse thrips
feeding damage 14 days after inoculation with 20 larval or 20 adult thrips (mean ± standard error). |
|||
|
Life
stage |
Area of
damage/20 thrips/14 days (cm2) |
Area of
fruit damaged per thrips-week (cm2) |
% reject
fruit (damage >2cm2) |
|
Larvae Adults |
1.46 ± 0.21 az 8.97 ± 0.47 b |
0.04 ± 0.01 a 0.22 ± 0.01 b |
20 100 |
|
zFigures within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly
different (P>0.05, t-test). |
|||
The area of fruit damage for each
adult thrips density/duration combination was
converted to thrips-weeks units (Table 2). The overall mean damage per adult thrips-week (± standard error) was 0.26 ± 0.01 cm2, but individual means for each
density/duration combination ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 cm2 per thrips-week. There was a significant interaction between
duration of feeding and thrips density on the damage
per thrips-week in the December trial (P<0.05).
There was no significant difference in thrips-weeks with increasing thrips
density (P>0.05) but there were differences between feeding durations
(P<0.05). There was no
significant interaction between duration of feeding and thrips
density on the damage per thrips-week in the March
trial (P>0.05). There were
significant differences in damage per thrips-week for
the various thrips densities (P<0.05) and
feeding durations (P<0.05) in March.
However, the differences between treatments were not clearly related to
increasing thrips density or feeding duration, and do
not suggest that damage is strongly affected by ‘interference’ between thrips over time or space.
|
Table 2.
The area of avocado fruit damaged (mean damage per thrips-week ± standard error) by greenhouse thrips
feeding after inoculation with various densities of adult thrips after 1, 3, or 4 weeks feeding duration. |
|||
|
Thrips density/fruit |
Damage
per thrips-weeks (cm2) |
||
|
Duration
of feeding (weeks) |
|||
|
|
1 |
2 |
4 |
|
December 1 5 10 20 |
0.2 ± 0.06 0.3 ± 0.04 0.2 ± 0.02 0.3 ± 0.03 |
0.5 ± 0.03 0.3 ± 0.01 0.3 ± 0.02 0.3 ± 0.02 |
0.3 ± 0.08 0.3± 0.03 0.2 ± 0.03 0.2 ± 0.01 |
|
March 1 5 10 20 |
0.4 ± 0.10 0.1 ± 0.02 0.1 ± 0.02 0.2 ± 0.02 |
0.4 ± 0.09 0.4 ± 0.07 0.2 ± 0.05 0.3 ± 0.06 |
0.4 ± 0.06 0.3 ±0.06 0.2 ± 0.05 0.2 ± 0.06 |
The significant differences in damage per thrips-weeks
resulting from the different thrips density/duration
combinations suggests that a prediction model could not reliably be
based on a simple additive approach.
However, calculations of the regression lines describing damage versus
feeding duration may allow the development of a more accurate predictive model.
There were significant linear
relationships between thrips density and feeding
damage, for each feeding duration (P<0.05) (Table 3). The regression lines were able to account for
much more of the variation in the data in the December trial than in the March
trial, as indicated by the R2 values.
|
Table 3.
The areas of avocado fruit damaged, and regression lines of best fit
for densities of 1, 5, 10 and 20 greenhouse thrips
per fruit over 1, 2, and 4 weeks feeding duration. |
|||
|
Thrips density per fruit |
Effect of
feeding duration on area of fruit damaged (cm2) (Mean ±
standard error) |
||
|
|
1 week |
2 weeks |
4 weeks |
|
December 1 5 10 20 Regression line R2 |
0.2 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.2 1.8 ± 0.2 6.2 ± 0.5 Y=-0.47+0.31x 0.84 |
0.9 ± 0.1 2.1 ± 0.1 5.0 ± 0.4 10.9 ± 0.6 Y=0.03+0.53x 0.93 |
1.1 ± 0.3 5.8 ± 0.6 9.5 ± 1.4 18.1 ± 0.5 Y=0.83+0.87x 0.90 |
|
March 1 5 10 20 Regression line R2 |
0.4 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.2 3.6 ± 0.4 Y=-0.25+0.18x 0.72 |
0.7 ± 0.2 3.5 ± 0.7 4.7 ± 0.9 10.3 ± 2.4 Y=0.41+0.49x 0.45 |
1.5 ± 0.3 5.3 ± 1.2 6.1 ± 2.1 15.2 ± 4.5 Y=0.84+0.69x 0.33 |
Solving the regression
lines for Y=2 cm2 gives the adult thrips
population density which would be expected to result in a reject fruit (Table
4). The three methods used to make predictions
(i.e. regression lines calculated separately for the December and March trials,
and values calculated from the overall mean damage per thrips-week
obtained over all trials) have very similar results over 2-4 weeks
feeding. However, there is a large
difference in the thrips density predicted to result
in 2 cm2 damage over 1 week’s feeding duration.
|
Table 4. Adult thrips density/fruit predicted to result in 2 cm2
scarring on fruit. |
|||
|
Type
of predictive model |
Adult thrips density predicted
to result in 2 cm2 damage |
||
|
|
Duration of feeding (weeks) |
||
|
|
1 |
2 |
4 |
|
Regression – December Regression – March Additive (0.26cm2
thrips-week) |
8.0 12.5 7.7 |
3.7 3.2 3.8 |
1.3 1.7 1.9 |
These results contribute to
the development of a spray threshold for greenhouse thrips
in avocados. However the thrips density predicted to result in reject fruit cannot
be used as a spray threshold on its own, as the level of thrips
feeding damage already present on the fruit and the time of year will also
affect the spray threshold. The aim of
the thrips monitoring system will be to only have a
small proportion of the fruit with damage severe enough to cause rejection from
export quality. Damage on most fruit
must be less than 2 cm2.
A key result from these
experiments is the finding that larval thrips result
in significantly less thrips damage to avocado fruit
than adults. A useful decision model for
managing greenhouse thrips therefore requires
information on the mean area of current fruit damage, and the mean density of thrips/fruit (by life stage). The area of current damage could be added to
the area of predicted damage over time to make spray decisions. The presence of larval thrips
or low levels of adult thrips may permit insecticide
applications to be delayed so that picking timetables are not disrupted. However, once picking is completed, lower
spray thresholds may be used to reduce overall thrips
population pressure in the orchard.
In the longer term, a reduced
reliance on insecticides for control of greenhouse thrips
is desirable. Control of greenhouse thrips in
Adult greenhouse thrips cause significantly more damage than larval thrips. The levels
of current damage as well as thrips population levels
will affect the spray threshold. Any thrips monitoring system should record current damage
level, and numbers of larval and adult thrips/fruit.
The authors would like to acknowledge the New Zealand Avocado
Industry Council for funding this research.
We would also like to thank Leonie Batt for
allowing us to carry out the trials on her orchard.
DENNILL, G.B.; ERASMUS, M.J., 1992a. The insect
pests of avocado fruit – increasing pest complex and changing pest status. J. Ent.
Soc. South
DENNILL, G.B.; ERASMUS, M.J., 1992b. Basis for
a practical technique for monitoring thrips in
avocado orchards. Crop
Protection 11:89-91.
MCMURTRY, J.A.; JOHNSON,
H.G.; NEWBERGER, S.J., 1991. Imported parasite of greenhouse thrips established in
PHILLIPS, P.A.; BEKEY, R.S.; BAILEY, J.B., 1995. Early harvest to manage greenhouse thrips in avocado, pp. 419-422. In: Thrips biology and Management. B.L. Parker, M. Skinner, T. Lewis (Eds.),
Plenum Press,
PHILLIPS,
P.A., 1997. Managing
greenhouse thrips in coastal avocados. Subtropical Fruit News
4(3).
SAS
Institute Inc., 1985. SAS Users Guide:
Basics, Version 5 Edition,
SPILLER, D.M.; WISE, K.A., 1982. A
catalogue (1860-1960) of
WYSOKI,
M.; KUZLITZKY, W.; ISHAR, Y.; SWIRSKI, E.; BEN-YEHUDA, S.; HADAR, D.; AND
RENEH, S., 1997. Successful
acclimatization of Thripobius semiluteus, a
parasitoid of Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis
(Bouché) in