1999. Revista Chapingo Serie Horticultura 5: 337-339.
INFECTION
OF UNRIPE AVOCADO FRUIT BY STEM END ROT FUNGI IN NEW ZEALAND
The Horticulture and Food Research
Institute of New Zealand Ltd. Private Bag 92169 Mt Albert, Auckland. NEW
ZEALAND. E-mail: keverett @ hort.cri.nz
INTRODUCTION
Johnson et al. (1991, 1992) has suggested that fungi that cause postharvest
rots in mango are both seed transmitted and endophytic within the plant.
lnfection of the stem end of fruit is via the endophytically infected pedicel.
Stem end rots might also infect avocado trees endophytically (Johnson 1997).
Overseas researchers (Prusky et al., 1982)
have shown that antifungal dienes are present in the skin of avocados in
fungitoxic amounts and prevent infection of immature avocados when the skin is
intact. However, these workers also showed that, in the flesh, antifungal
dienes were compartmentalised into oil cells and were therefore only available
in subfungitoxic levels. Once the skin was breached by peeling, the pathogen (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) was
able to rot unripe flesh (Kobiler et al.,
1993). Avocado fruit that had been sprayed by benomyl twice during
flowering had less stem end rots than unsprayed control fruit at harvest
(Everett et al., 1999). These results
suggest infection of avocado fruit by stem end rot fungi may occur at
flowering. lf stem end rots infect avocados by invasion from fungal mycelium
growing down the pedicel, then unripe avocado fruit should be able to be
infected as there is no skin barrier to invasion. lnfection of the stem end in
unripe fruit would provide evidence to support this hypothesis. The following
experiment was designed to test this hypothesis to further elucidate the
infection mechanism by stem end rots and therefore enable effective and focused
control strategies to be developed.
METHODS
Fruit from an unsprayed orchard
was harvested 14 months after fruit set at a dry matter content of >30%.
Fruit were placed in boxes, 10 per box at 200C. Fifty fruit per day
for 16 days were cut (the first 50 two days after harvest) and assessed for
stem end rots using a 0-10 visual rating scale for severity where O = no
disease and 10 = totally rotten. Fruit were tested for ripeness by hand using a
1-10 scale where 1= hard, 5=optimally ripe and 10= soft.
RESULTS
Ripeness was assessed by hand each day as
fruit were cut. ln some unripe fruit a small amount of browning was noted at
the stern end. ln unripe fruit, this browning remained localized and did not
develop further. When disease progress curves of cumulative mean severity score
were examined, disease increased exponentially with increasing ripeness (Figure
1).

Figure 1: Disease
progress curve (cumulative mean severity) compared to ripeness of fruit
determined by gentle hand squeezing.
The incidence of the browning
symptom in unripe fruit at a ripeness of 1 was the same as the incidence of
disease in fruit at optimal ripeness (Fig. 2 (a), dotted one). The incidence of
the browning symptom declined in fruit at a ripeness of 2, 3 and 4. When fruit
with this browning symptom were excluded disease followed a sigmoidal curve
(Figure 2 (b). With the browning symptom in unripe fruit included the curve
followed two trends, one decreasing (ripeness of 1-4) and the other increasing
(ripeness of >4). Attempts to isolate fungi from the browning symptom in
unripe fruit were not successful.
Ripening followed a sigmoidal
pattern of increase over time, whilst rots, when severity values were used
instead of incidence, followed an exponential increase over time. When the two
were plotted on the same graph (Figure 3), there was no apparent point after
which disease increased more rapidly. However, before optimal ripeness was
reached at day 8 (arrowed in Figure 3) disease increased less rapidly than the
fitted exponential curve. After day 8, disease increased at the same rate as
the fitted exponential curve.
a)
b)

Figure 2. Disease progress curve
(incidence) compared to ripeness of fruit determined by gentle hand squeezing. (a) including fruit with initial browning symptom, and (b) excluding
fruit with initial browning symptom. Dotted line in (a) represents the
incidence of the initial browning symptom at a ripeness of 1.

Fig. 3: Change in mean
severity of stem end rots and ripeness (as determined by gentle hand squeezing)
in time (days) after harvest.
DISCUSSION
Results of this study do not
support the hypothesis that stern end rots are caused by endophytic populations
of fungi growing down the pedicel to infect fruit. No inhibition of endophytic
invasion of stem end rot fungi through the pedicel by antifungal dienes is
expected because of compartmentalization of antifungal dienes in oil cells in
the flesh of avocado (Kobiler, 1993). Slight browning was occurring, but no
fungi were able to be isolated. This indicates either that other host defense
mechanisms, such as suberisation and hypersensitivity, preclude the fungus from
growing any further in unripe fruit and kill the fungus, or that this symptom
of physiological and not
pathological. ln support of a physiological cause, as fruit ripen (Figure 2
(a)), the slight browning symptom declines, and rot symptoms increase. Even if
the slight browning symptom is caused by a host response to fungal invasion of
the fruit through the pedicel, these results show that host defense mechanisms
preclude invasion of unripe avocado fruit through the stem end.
ln conclusion, the pedicel could
be an important source of infection, but probably not by systemic invasion. It
is more likely that infection occurs by contamination of the stem end wound at
harvest. If the outer layers of the stem tissue are infected, cutting with
scatters could disperse the inoculums over the stem end wound. Reduction in
stem end rots by applying benomyl at flowering (Everett et al., 1999) is probably achieved by reducing infection of the
pedicel.
LITERATURE CITED
EVERETT,
K.R.; STEVENS, P.S.; CUTTING, J.G.M. 1999. Postharvest fruit rots of avocado reduced by benomyl applications during
flowering. Proceedings of the 52nd Plant Protection Conference. in press.
JOHNSON, G.l.
1997. Mango disease losses: balancing economy and ecology. Acta Horticulturae
455: 575-586.
JOHNSON, G.l.;
MEAD, A.J.; COOKE, A.W.; DEAN, J.R. 1991. Mango stem end rot pathogens-
lnfection levels between flowering and harvest. Ann. Appl. Biol. 119: 465-473.
JOHNSON, G.l.;
MEAD, A.J.; COOKE, A.W.; DEAN, J.R. 1992. Mango stem end rot pathogens- Fruit
infection by endophytic colonisation of the inflorescence and pedicel. Ann.
Appl. Biol. 120: 225-234.
KOBILER,
L.; PRUSKY, D.; MIDLAND, S.; SIMS, J.J.; KEEN, N.T. 1993. Compartmentation of antifungal compounds in oil
cells of avocado fruit mesocarp and its effect on susceptibility to Colletotriohum gloeosporioides. Physiological
and Molecular Plant Pathology 43: 31 9-328.
PRUSKY, D.;
KEEN, N.T.; SIMS, J.J.; MIDLAND, S.L. 1982. Possible involvement of an
antifungal diene in the latency of Colletotrichum
gloeosporioides on unripe avocado fruits. Phytopathology 72: 1578-1582.