Proc. of Second World Avocado Congress 1992 pp.75-78
Timing of Phosphonate Trunk Injections for Phytophthora Root Rot Control in Avocado Trees
Anthony W. Whiley, Jack B. Saranah, and Peter W. Langdon
Philip A. Hargreaves, Ken G. Pegg, and Leslie J. Ruddle
of Primary Industries,
Abstract. Avocado trees, cv. Hass, were trunk-injected with 20% phosphonic acid, formulated as potassium phosphonate, at various stages of tree phenology and the dynamics of translocation to the roots studied. Phosphonate was detected in the leaves 24 h after trunk injection with the concentration peaking (60-80 mg/kg) within the first 10 days. However, the rate of accumulation and final concentration of phosphonate in the roots was dependent on the time of injection in relation to the sink/source status of the leafy shoots. Trunk injection at the beginning of the spring growth, when renewal shoots were strong sinks, resulted in phosphonate root con- centrations of < 9 mg/kg which peaked at about 45 days after treatment. When phosphonate injections were given after the sink/source transition of the spring shoots, root concentrations increased to > 28 mg/kg at about 60 days after treat- ment. Injections of potassium phosphonate given during the period of summer shoot growth gave similar concentrations of phosphonate in the roots to the treat- ment given at spring shoot maturity.
Materials and Method
The trees selected for the experiment were healthy
twelve-year-old 'Hass' grafted to Velvick seedling
rootstock, and had never been injected or sprayed with phosphonate
fungicides. The trees were growing in a commercial orchard in subtropical
The concentration flux of phosphonate in leaves for the 98 days it was monitored was fitted to the model derived by Wood (1967) where y = axb e-cx. Regression analysis were used for the concentration flux in roots.
After each injection the subse- quent rise in leaf phosphonate concentration was rapid, reaching a peak after 10 to 12 days of between 60 to 70 mg/kg (Fig. 1). This was followed by a decline in leaf phosphonate to < 5 mg/kg 80 days after injection. Similarly the root phosphonate concentrations increased soon after trunk injection but at a slower rate and the maximum concentrations measured were considerably lower than in leaves (Fig. 1). Roots of those trees injected at the beginning of the renewal growth in spring, reached a maximum of ≈ 9.0 mg/kg phosphonate about 45 days after treatment. However, the roots of trees treated when all leaves on spring-grown shoots were fully expanded had a phosphonate concentration of ≈ 28 mg/kg about 60 days after injection. The experiment was repeated the following spring using another set of trees and similar results were obtained (data not presented).
While some controversy exists in the literature on the mode of action of phosphonates in disease prevention it is clear that the organ targeted for protection must receive a minimum concentration of the fungicide for the mechanism to be effective. For efficient management of the technology, the grower should know when to inject his trees to maximize the translocation of phosphonate to the roots during the time when disease pressures are greatest. Our research has shown that trunk-injected phosphonate begins accumulating the roots of avocado trees within a few days of injection confirming previous results of Schutte et at. (1988). However, it is clear that the time of injection in relation to tree phenology is critical with respect to maximizing the translocation of phosphonate to the roots. In actively growing trees, the maximum concentration of phosphonate to accumulate in the roots after injection at the beginning of spring shoot growth (≈ 9.0 mg/kg), was significantly lower than the minimum of 20 mg/kg thought to be required for protection against Phytophthora cinnamomi in field grown trees (Pegg and Whiley, unpublished data). However, in contrast up to ≈ 28 mg/kg of phosphonate was measured in roots injected at the completion of spring shoot growth.
The efficiency of translocation of phosphonate to the roots appears directly relate to the sink/source status of the leafy canopy at the time of injection (Whiley, 1990; Pegg et at., 1990). Following flowering there is a strong synchronization of shoot growth in the canopy which effectively remains a sink for 40 days after bud-break and injection should be avoided during this time. About 60 days after the terminal bud of the indeterminant panicle begins growing the shoots reach their maximum rate of photoassimilation (Whiley, 1990). During this time there is an effective translocation of photoassimilates from the leaves to the roots (Whiley and Schaffer, unpublished data). We believe that phosphonate arriving in the leaves via the xylem stream, is more effectively translocated by the greater basipetal mass-flow of photoassimilates at this stage of tree phenology.
Trunk injection during the summer when some new shoot growth was occurring gave a similar accumulation of phosphonate in roots to those of trees injected at the maturity of the spring growth (data not presented). Sporadic shoot growth without synchrony of the whole tree occurs within the canopy during summer. However, at anyone time there a sufficient 'source' leaves to enact efficient translocation of the fungicide to the roots when tree are injected during this period.
By strategically timing the trunk injection of phosphonates into avocado trees the efficiency of translocation
of the fungicide to the roots can be increased by about 300%. This more
effective use of fungicide will be off considerable economic benefit to
producers requiring a root rot man- agement program.
We thank the Other Fruits Committee of COD, UIM Agrochemicals (Aust.) Pty Ltd, Albright and Wilson (Aust.) Ltd, and the Australian Special Rural Research Council for their generous financial support.
Darvas, J.M., J.C. Toerien, and D.L. Milne. 1984. Control of avocado root rot by trunk injection with phosetyl-AI. Plant Disease 68: 691-693.
Lüttringer, M. and L. De Cormis. 1985. Absorption, degradation et transport du phosethyl-AI et de son métabolite chez la tomate. Agronomie. 5:423-430.
Pegg, K.G., A.W. Whiley, J.B. Saranah, and R.J. Glass. 1985. Control of Phytophthora root rot of avocado with phosphorous acid. Austral. Plant Path. 14:25-9.
Pegg, K.G., A.W. Whiley, and P.A. Harg- reaves. 1990. Phosphorous acid treatments control Phytophthora diseases in avocado and pineapple. Austral. Plant Path. 19:122-124.
Pegg, K.G., A.W. Whiley, P.W. Langdon, and J.B. Saranah. 1987. Comparison of phosetyl-AI, phosphorous acid and metalaxyl for the long-term control of Phytophthora root rot of avocado. Austral. J. Exp. Agri. 27:471-474.
Schutte, G.C., T. Botha, J.J. Bezuidenhout, and J.M. Kotzé. 1988. Distribution of phosphite in avocado trees after trunk injection with phosphorous acid and its possible response to Phytophthora cinnamomi. S. A. Avocado Growers' Assn. Yrbk. 12:32-34.
Whiley, A. W.
assimilation of developing fruiting shoots of cv.
Hass avocado (Persea
Whiley, A.W., J.B. Saranah, B.W. Cull, and K.G. Pegg. 1988. Manage avocado tree growth cycles for productivity gains. Qld. Agri. J. 114:29-36.
Wood, P.D.P. 1967. Algebraic model of the lactation curve in cattle. Nature 216:164-165.
Zentmyer, G.A. 1979. Effect
of physical factors, host resistance and fungicides on root infection at the
soil-root interface, p. 315-328. In: J.L. Harley and R. Scott Russell
(eds.) The Soil-Root Interface. Academic,